A pressure ulcer audit and feedback project across multi-hospital settings in the Netherlands

被引:23
作者
Bours, GJJW
Halfens, RJG
Candel, MJJM
Grol, RTPM
Abu-Saad, HH
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Nursing Sci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Methodol & Stat, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Res Qual Family Practice, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Maastricht, Ctr Res Qual Family Practice, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Amer Univ Beirut, Sch Nursing, Beirut, Lebanon
[6] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Med, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
audit; case-mix adjustment; feedback; pressure ulcers; quality improvement;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzh034
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To examine whether participating in a pressure ulcer prevalence survey and receiving feedback results in an improvement in quality of care. Design. Cross-sectional studies from 1998 to 2002 were compared over time. Setting. Sixty-two acute care hospitals in the Netherlands. Study participants. Patients hospitalized at the moment of the surveys. Interventions. Each hospital was given hospital-specific performance data and national aggregate data, and peer comparisons to improve the quality of care. Main outcome measures. The case-mix-adjusted prevalence of pressure ulcers of grade greater than or equal to2, the percentage of high-risk patients receiving adequate prevention, and the total number of enabling conditions present were compared between successive surveys using multi-level analysis, in order to estimate a linear trend model and trend differences for each hospital. Results. The case-mix-adjusted prevalence of pressure ulcers decreased over the 5-year period, while the percentage of patients receiving adequate prevention and the total number of enabling conditions present increased. The total number of enabling conditions had a significant effect on the decrease in case-mix-adjusted prevalence: more enabling conditions led to a lower case-mix-adjusted. prevalence (chi(2) = 125; degrees of freedom = 1; P < 0.00). The percentage of patients receiving adequate prevention also had an effect on the change in case-mix-adjusted prevalence, with a higher percentage leading to a lower case-mix-adjusted prevalence. This effect, however, was not significant. Conclusions. Monitoring prevalence and giving feedback results in an improvement in quality of care in terms of pressure ulcer prevention. It is very important to continue conducting surveys to avoid attention moving away from this topic, which may in turn lead to a deterioration in the quality of pressure ulcer care. Further research to find the most effective feedback approach is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 218
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Br J Nurs, V7, P888
[2]  
[Anonymous], AHCPR PUBL
[3]  
BARBENEL JC, 2001, LIMITS PRESSURE ULCE, V3
[4]  
Barczak C A, 1997, Adv Wound Care, V10, P18
[5]   THE BRADEN SCALE FOR PREDICTING PRESSURE SORE RISK [J].
BERGSTROM, N ;
BRADEN, BJ ;
LAGUZZA, A ;
HOLMAN, V .
NURSING RESEARCH, 1987, 36 (04) :205-210
[6]   Are we improving the quality of nursing home care: The case of pressure ulcers [J].
Berlowitz, DR ;
Bezerra, HQ ;
Brandeis, GH ;
Kader, B ;
Anderson, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2000, 48 (01) :59-62
[7]  
Bero LA, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P465
[8]  
Boes C, 2000, Pflege, V13, P397, DOI 10.1024/1012-5302.13.6.397
[9]  
Bours G J, 1999, Ostomy Wound Manage, V45, P28
[10]  
BOURS GJJ, 1998, NATL PRESSURE ULCER