optimal interval for major maintenance actions in electricity distribution networks

被引:31
作者
Louit, Darko [1 ]
Pascual, Rodrigo [1 ]
Banjevic, Dragan [2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Ctr Mineria, Santiago 4860, Chile
[2] Univ Toronto, Ctr Maintenance Optimizat & Reliabil Engn, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
关键词
Asset management; Major maintenance actions; Electricity network; FAILURE; COST; EQUIPMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.03.021
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Many systems require the periodic undertaking of major (preventive) maintenance actions (MMAs) such as overhauls in mechanical equipment, reconditioning of train lines, resurfacing of roads, etc. In the long term, these actions contribute to achieving a lower rate of occurrence of failures, though in many cases they increase the intensity of the failure process shortly after performed, resulting in a non-monotonic trend for failure intensity. Also, in the special case of distributed assets such as communications and energy networks, pipelines, etc., it is likely that the maintenance action takes place sequentially over an extended period of time, implying that different sections of the network underwent the MMAs at different periods. This forces the development of a model based on a relative time scale (i.e. time since last major maintenance event) and the combination of data from different sections of a grid, under a normalization scheme. Additionally, extended maintenance times and sequential execution of the MMAs make it difficult to identify failures occurring before and after the preventive maintenance action. This results in the loss of important information for the characterization of the failure process. A simple model is introduced to determine the optimal MMA interval considering such restrictions. Furthermore, a case study illustrates the optimal tree trimming interval around an electricity distribution network. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 401
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Calculating the expected failure rate of complex equipment subject to hazardous repair [J].
Baker, RD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2000, 67 (01) :53-61
[2]   OPTIMUM PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE POLICIES [J].
BARLOW, R ;
HUNTER, L .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1960, 8 (01) :90-100
[3]   Cost related reliability evaluation of bulk power systems [J].
Billinton, R ;
Zhang, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2001, 23 (02) :99-112
[4]  
COETZEE JL, 1996, 21 ICOMS
[5]  
Ebeling C.E., 1997, An Introduction to Reliability and the Maintainability Engineering
[6]  
Jardine A.K.S., 2006, Maintenance, Replacement and Reliability
[7]  
KOONCE AM, 2008, ELECT POWER ENERGY S, V30, P169, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IJEPES.2007.06.013
[8]   RELIABILITY INVESTIGATION FOR A FLEET OF LOAD HAUL DUMP MACHINES IN A SWEDISH MINE [J].
KUMAR, U ;
KLEFSJO, B ;
GRANHOLM, S .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1989, 26 (04) :341-361
[9]  
PASCUAL R, RELIAB ENG IN PRESS
[10]   Modeling the failure data of a repairable equipment with bathtub type failure intensity [J].
Pulcini, G .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 71 (02) :209-218