Performance of PROMIS Instruments in Patients With Shoulder Instability

被引:86
作者
Anthony, Chris A. [1 ,2 ]
Glass, Natalie A. [1 ,2 ]
Hancock, Kyle [1 ,2 ]
Bollier, Matt [1 ,2 ]
Wolf, Brian R. [1 ,2 ]
Hettrich, Carolyn M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, 200 Hawkins Dr,01008 JPP, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
outcomes; shoulder; instability; PROMIS; ANTERIOR GLENOHUMERAL INSTABILITY; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; HEALTH SURVEY SF-36; REPORTED OUTCOMES; STABILIZATION; DISLOCATION; BANKING; TRIAL; INDEX;
D O I
10.1177/0363546516668304
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Background: Shoulder instability is a relatively common condition occurring in 2% of the population. PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System) was developed by the National Institutes of Health in an effort to advance patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments by developing question banks for major health domains. Purpose: To compare PROMIS instruments to current PRO instruments in patients who would be undergoing operative intervention for recurrent shoulder instability. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 74 patients with a primary diagnosis of shoulder instability who would be undergoing surgery were asked to fill out the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder assessment form (ASES), Marx shoulder activity scale (Marx), Short Form-36 Health Survey Physical Function subscale (SF-36 PF), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test (PF CAT), and PROMIS upper extremity item bank (UE). Correlation between PRO instruments was defined as excellent (>0.7), excellent-good (0.61-0.7), good (0.4-0.6), and poor (0.2-0.3). Results: Utilization of the PROMIS UE demonstrated excellent correlation with the SF-36 PF (r = 0.78, P < .01) and ASES (r = 0.71, P < .01); there was excellent-good correlation with the EQ-5D (r = 0.66, P < .01), WOSI (r = 0.63, P < .01), and PROMIS PF CAT (r = 0.63, P < .01). Utilization of the PROMIS PF CAT demonstrated excellent correlation with the SF-36 PF (r = 0.72, P < .01); there was excellent-good correlation with the ASES (r = 0.67, P < .01) and PROMIS UE (r = 0.63, P < .01). When utilizing the PROMIS UE, ceiling effects were present in 28.6% of patients aged 18 to 21 years. Patients, on average, answered 4.6 1.8 questions utilizing the PROMIS PF CAT. Conclusion: The PROMIS UE and PROMIS PF CAT demonstrated good to excellent correlation with common shoulder and upper extremity PRO instruments as well as the SF-36 PF in patients with shoulder instability. In patients aged 21 years, there were significant ceiling effects utilizing the PROMIS UE. While the PROMIS PF CAT appears appropriate for use in adults of any age, our findings demonstrate that the PROMIS UE has significant ceiling effects in patients with shoulder instability who are 21 years old, and we do not recommend use of the PROMIS UE in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 453
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Multidirectional Instability: Evaluation and Treatment Options [J].
Bahu, Maher J. ;
Trentacosta, Natasha ;
Vorys, George Christian ;
Covey, Aaron S. ;
Ahmad, Christopher S. .
CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (04) :671-+
[2]
Evaluation of the Instability Severity Index Score and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index as predictors of failure following arthroscopic Bankart repair [J].
Bouliane, M. ;
Saliken, D. ;
Beaupre, L. A. ;
Silveira, A. ;
Saraswat, M. K. ;
Sheps, D. M. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2014, 96B (12) :1688-1692
[3]
Evidence-based orthopaedic surgery - What type of research will best improve clinical practice? [J].
Carr, AJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (12) :1593-1594
[4]
The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment [J].
Cella, David ;
Gershon, Richard ;
Lai, Jin-Shei ;
Choi, Seung .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (Suppl 1) :133-141
[5]
Chakravarty EF, 2007, J RHEUMATOL, V34, P1426
[6]
Do Arthroscopic and Open Stabilization Techniques Restore Equivalent Stability to the Shoulder in the Setting of Anterior Glenohumeral Instability? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses [J].
Chalmers, Peter N. ;
Mascarenhas, Randy ;
Leroux, Timothy ;
Sayegh, Eli T. ;
Verma, Nikhil N. ;
Cole, Brian J. ;
Romeo, Anthony A. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (02) :355-363
[7]
The assessment of shoulder instability - The development and validation of a questionnaire [J].
Dawson, J ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Carr, A .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1999, 81B (03) :420-426
[8]
Deshpande Prasanna R, 2011, Perspect Clin Res, V2, P137, DOI 10.4103/2229-3485.86879
[9]
Anterior Glenohumeral Joint Dislocations [J].
Dodson, Christopher C. ;
Cordasco, Frank A. .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 39 (04) :507-518
[10]
Measurement of Upper Extremity Disability Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [J].
Doering, Anne-Carolin ;
Nota, Sjoerd P. F. T. ;
Hageman, Michiel G. J. S. ;
Ring, David C. .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 39 (06) :1160-1165