Reducing negative appendectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and computer tomography in acute appendicitis

被引:30
作者
Styrud, J [1 ]
Josephson, T
Eriksson, S
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Danderyd Hosp, Dept Surg, S-18288 Danderyd, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Danderyd Hosp, Dept Radiol, S-18288 Danderyd, Sweden
关键词
acute appendicitis; appendectomy; computed tomography; diagnostic accuracy; ultrasound examination;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/12.1.65
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To study the sensitivity and the specificitty for ultrasonography and computed tomography in patients with suspected appendicitis, and their value to the clinician. Design. Retrospective study. Setting. Teaching hospital, Sweden. Main outcome measures. The negative appendectomy rate and the sensitivity and the specificity for ultrasonography and computed tomography in patients with suspected appendicitis. Result. The diagnostic accuracy was 88% (men 95%, women 80%). Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were examined by ultrasonography preoperatively. The sensitivity for ultrasonography was 0.82 and the specificity was 0.97. Forty-nine patients were examined by computed tomography; preoperatively. The sensitivity for computer tomography was 0.88 and the specificity was 0.95. Conclusions. We conclude that ultrasound and computed tomography investigations on patients with suspected appendicitis are of great value. Computed tomography seems to have a higher sensitivity than ultrasound and a high specificity. In fertile women, where unnecessary surgery is best avoided, we believe that computed tomography investigation or ultrasound examination are better alternatives to surgical intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 68
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Computed tomography in acute left colonic diverticulitis [J].
Ambrosetti, P ;
Grossholz, M ;
Becker, C ;
Terrier, F ;
Morel, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 84 (04) :532-534
[2]   APPENDICITIS - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION WITH HIGH-RESOLUTION CT [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
SIEGEL, SE ;
BIRNBAUM, BA .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 180 (01) :21-24
[3]  
BIRNBAUM BA, 1994, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V32, P885
[4]   CT DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS - IMAGING FINDINGS [J].
CURTIN, KR ;
FITZGERALD, SW ;
NEMCEK, AA ;
HOFF, FL ;
VOGELZANG, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (04) :905-909
[5]  
Eriksson S, 1996, EUR J SURG, V162, P435
[6]  
ERIKSSON S, 1995, ACTA RADIOL, V36, P173
[7]   RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF APPENDECTOMY VERSUS ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY FOR ACUTE APPENDICITIS [J].
ERIKSSON, S ;
GRANSTROM, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (02) :166-169
[8]  
GRANSTROM L, 1992, SURG RES COMM, V11, P309
[9]  
Hall FM, 1997, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V277, P626, DOI 10.1001/jama.1997.03540320028020
[10]   IN PATIENTS WITH RIGHT LOWER QUADRANT PAIN, IS SONOGRAPHY OR CT THE PREFERRED IMAGING TECHNIQUE FOR INITIAL EVALUATION [J].
JEFFREY, RB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (06) :1547-1548