Indispensability and indefensibility? The United States in the climate treaty negotiations

被引：23

作者：

Agrawala, S ^{[1
]}

Andresen, S ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Columbia Univ, Int Res Inst Climate Predict, Climate Applicat Div, New York, NY 10027 USA

来源：

GLOBAL GOVERNANCE | 1999年 / 5卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1163/19426720-00504004

中图分类号：

D81 [国际关系];

学科分类号：

030207 ;

摘要：

The United States has a penchant these days for joining international negotiations that spin out of control. We went to Kyoto to talk about climate change and discovered we couldn't sign the treaty. We went to Ottawa to talk about landmines and found our military problems ignored by other states. We may be the "indispensable country," as Secretary of State Madeleine Albright likes to say. But we often set ourselves up as Alamo holdouts, criticized as the indispensable country with indefensible positions.

引用

页码：457 / 482

页数：26

共 27 条

[1] Early science-policy interactions in climate change: lessons from the Advisory Group on Greenhouse Gases
Agrawala, S
[J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 1999, 9 (02): : 157 - 169
[2] Context and early origins of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
Agrawala, S
[J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1998, 39 (04) : 605 - 620
[3] Structural and process history of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
Agrawala, S
[J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1998, 39 (04) : 621 - 642
[4] ANDRESEN S, 1993, EED PUBLICATION, V3
[5] ANDRESEN S, 398 FRIDTJ NANS I
[6] Bodanski D., 1993, Yale Journal of International Law, V18, P451
[7] BUSH G, 1988, COMMUNICATION 0831
[8] *COUNC EC ADV, 1990, EC REP PRES
[9] FINEMAN H, 1997, NEWSWEEK 1027
[10] HANSEN J, 1988, COMMUNICATION 0623

← 1 2 3 →