Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge-Part I: Phase I Problem definition

被引:77
作者
Agrawal, Anil [1 ]
Tan, Ping [2 ]
Nagarajaiah, Satish [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Jian [5 ]
机构
[1] CUNY City Coll, Dept Civil Engn, New York, NY 10031 USA
[2] Guangzhou Univ, Earthquake Engn Res & Test Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Rice Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[4] Rice Univ, Dept Mech Engn & Mat Sci, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
structural response control; seismically excited highway bridge; highway bridge benchmark problem; earthquake response control; smart protective systems; SAMPLE CONTROLLERS; RESPONSE CONTROL;
D O I
10.1002/stc.301
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents the problem definition of the benchmark structural control problem for the seismically excited highway bridge. The benchmark problem is based on the newly constructed 91/5 highway over-crossing in southern California. The goal of this benchmark effort is to develop a standardized model of a highway bridge using which competing control strategies, including devices, algorithms and sensors, can be evaluated comparatively. To achieve this goal, a 3D finite-element model is developed in MATLAB to represent the complex behavior of the full-scale highway over-crossing. The nonlinear behavior of center columns and isolation bearings is considered in formulating the bilinear force-deformation relationship. The effect of soil-structure interaction is considered by modeling the interaction by equivalent spring and dashpot. The ground motions are considered to be applied simultaneously in two directions. A MATLAB-based nonlinear structural analysis tool has been developed and made available for nonlinear dynamic analysis. Control devices are assumed to be installed between the deck and the end abutments of the bridge. Evaluation criteria and control constraints are specified for the design of controllers. Passive, semi-active and active devices and algorithms can be used to study the benchmark model. The participants in this benchmark study are required to define their control devices, sensors and control algorithms, evaluate and report the results of their proposed control strategies. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 529
页数:21
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Caicedo J.M., 2003, J STRUCTURAL CONTROL, V10, P137, DOI DOI 10.1002/STC.23
[2]  
Caughey TK, 1998, EARTHQUAKE ENG STRUC, V27, P1125, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(1998110)27:11<1125::AID-EQE791>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-S
[4]  
CHENG FY, 2001, APPL EARTHQUAKE ENG
[5]   Phase I benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable-stayed bridges [J].
Dyke, SJ ;
Caicedo, JM ;
Turan, G ;
Bergman, LA ;
Hague, S .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2003, 129 (07) :857-872
[6]  
Feng M Q., 2000, Journal of Bridge Engineering, V5, P67, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:1(67)
[7]  
*HIBB KARLSS SOR, 2003, ABAQUS
[8]   COLLOCATION, DISSIPATION AND OVERSHOOT FOR TIME INTEGRATION SCHEMES IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS [J].
HILBER, HM ;
HUGHES, TJR .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1978, 6 (01) :99-117
[9]   SEISMIC RESPONSE CONTROL OF BRIDGES BY VARIABLE DAMPERS [J].
KAWASHIMA, K ;
UNJOH, S .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1994, 120 (09) :2583-2601
[10]  
MAKRIS N, 2002, PEER200217 U CAL