Anti-predator behaviour changes following an aggressive encounter in the lizard Tropidurus hispidus

被引:73
作者
Díaz-Uriarte, R
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Zool, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Stat, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
anti-predator behaviour; predation risk; aggressive behaviour; territoriality; trade-off; Tropidurus hispidus;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.1999.0946
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Avoiding predators may conflict with territorial defence because a hiding territorial resident is unable to monitor its territory or defend it from conspecific intrusions. With persistent intruders, the presence of an intruder in the near past can indicate an increased probability of future intrusions. Therefore, following a conspecific intrusion, territorial residents should minimize costs from future intrusions at the cost of higher predation risks. I conducted experiments with males of the territorial lizard Tropidurus hispidus recording approach distance (distance between predator and prey when the prey escapes) and time to re-emergence from a refuge after hiding. Past aggressive interactions affected anti-predator behaviour: lizards re-emerged sooner (compared to a control) when the predator attacked 5 min after an aggressive encounter. If the predator attacked while an aggressive encounter was ongoing, there was also a reduction in approach distance. The results are consistent with an economic hypothesis which predicts that T. hispidus incur greater predation risks to minimize future territorial intrusion; additionally they show that the effects of past and ongoing aggressive interactions are different, consistent with the minimization of present intrusion costs. These results are relevant for studies of the changes in aggressive behaviour due to changes in the social environment and for studies of the costs and (co) evolution of aggressive and antipredator strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:2457 / 2464
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   AGONISTIC BEHAVIOR IN MALE AND FEMALE FIELD CRICKETS, GRYLLUS-BIMACULATUS, AND HOW BEHAVIORAL CONTEXT INFLUENCES ITS EXPRESSION [J].
ADAMO, SA ;
HOY, RR .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1995, 49 (06) :1491-1501
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Randomization tests
[3]   AGE, INTRUSION PRESSURE AND DEFENSE AGAINST FLOATERS BY TERRITORIAL-MALE SONG SPARROWS [J].
ARCESE, P .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1987, 35 :773-784
[4]  
BATES DM, 1999, MIXED EFFECTS MODELS
[5]   SENSORY CAPABILITIES, INFORMATION-PROCESSING, AND RESOURCE SPECIALIZATION [J].
BERNAYS, EA ;
WCISLO, WT .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1994, 69 (02) :187-204
[6]   Fighting behaviour, vigilance and predation risk in the cichlid fish Nannacara anomala [J].
Brick, O .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1998, 56 :309-317
[7]   AGGRESSIVE INTERACTIONS AND INTER-CONTEST INTERVAL - HOW LONG DO WINNERS KEEP WINNING [J].
CHASE, ID ;
BARTOLOMEO, C ;
DUGATKIN, LA .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1994, 48 (02) :393-400
[8]   ANTIPREDATOR BEHAVIOR AND THE ASSET-PROTECTION PRINCIPLE [J].
CLARK, CW .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 1994, 5 (02) :159-170
[9]  
Diggle P., 2002, Analysis of Longitudinal Data
[10]  
Feingold M, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P953, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960530)15:10<953::AID-SIM213>3.0.CO