What is the optimal goal of primary cytoreductive surgery for bulky stage IIIC epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC)?

被引:505
作者
Chi, D. S. [1 ]
Eisenhauer, E. L. [1 ]
Lang, J. [1 ]
Huh, J. [1 ]
Haddad, L. [1 ]
Abu-Rustum, N. R. [1 ]
Sonoda, Y. [1 ]
Levine, D. A. [1 ]
Hensley, M. [1 ]
Barakat, R. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Gynecol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
optimal cytoreduction; survival; advanced ovarian cancer; residual disease;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.03.051
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Recent studies have suggested that the definition of optimal cytoreduction for advanced EOC should be changed from the current Gynecologic Oncology Group threshold of <= 1 cm residual disease to no gross residual disease owing to improved survival of patients (pts) rendered macroscopically disease-free. The objective of this study was to analyze survival rates at very specific residual disease diameters to determine the optimal goal of primary cytoreduction for bulky stage IIIC EOC. Methods. A prospectively kept database was used to identify and review the records of all pts with Stage IIIC EOC who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery at our institution between January 1989 and December 2003. To analyze a homogeneous cohort of cases, we excluded pts with stage IIIC disease based on nodal metastasis alone (without bulky abdominal tumor), fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinomas, and borderline tumors. Standard statistical analyses were utilized. Results. The study cohort included 465 pts. The median age was 60 years (range, 25-87), and the median follow-up was 38 months (range, 1-199). Univariate and multivariate analyses, which included various prognostic factors, identified amount of residual disease as a significant prognostic factor (P < 0.001). Median overall survival in relation to the 5 residual disease categories was: no gross residual, 106 months; gross <= 0.5 cm, 66 months; 0.6-1.0 cm, 48 months; 1-2 cm, 33 months; > 2 cm, 34 months. Statistical comparison between the 5 residual disease categories revealed 3 distinct groups with significantly different survival rates (P < 0.01). These 3 groups were: (1) no gross residual; (2) gross <= 1 em residual; and (3) > 1 cm residual. Although the difference in survival did not reach statistical significance, within the gross <= 1 cm residual group, there was a trend toward improved survival in pts left with smaller volume, <= 0.5 cm residual compared with those with 0.6-1.0 cm residual (P = 0.06). Conclusion. Our data suggest that removal of all evidence of macroscopic disease is associated with prolonged survival and should be the goal of primary cytoreductive surgery. If complete gross resection is not feasible, however, cytoreduction to as minimal residual tumor as possible should be the focus of cytoreductive efforts, as each incremental decrease in residual disease below 1 cm may be associated with an incremental improvement in overall survival. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 564
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GYNECOL ONCOL
[2]   Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer [J].
Armstrong, DK ;
Bundy, B ;
Wenzel, L ;
Huang, HQ ;
Baergen, R ;
Lele, S ;
Copeland, LJ ;
Walker, JL ;
Burger, RA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (01) :34-43
[3]   Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma: Results of long-term follow-up [J].
Barakat, RR ;
Sabbatini, P ;
Bhaskaran, D ;
Revzin, M ;
Smith, A ;
Venkatraman, E ;
Aghajanian, C ;
Hensley, M ;
Soignet, S ;
Brown, C ;
Soslow, R ;
Markman, M ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Spriggs, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (03) :694-698
[4]   Ablation of metastatic ovarian carcinoma with the argon beam coagulator: Pathologic analysis of tumor destruction [J].
Bristow, RE ;
Sehdev, AES ;
Kaufman, HS ;
Montz, FJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 83 (01) :49-55
[5]   Complete surgical cytoreduction of advanced ovarian carcinoma using the argon beam coagulator [J].
Bristow, RE ;
Montz, FJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 83 (01) :39-48
[6]   Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: A meta-analysis [J].
Bristow, RE ;
Tomacruz, RS ;
Armstrong, DK ;
Trimble, EL ;
Montz, FJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (05) :1248-1259
[7]   Improved optimal cytoreduction rates for stages IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: a change in surgical approach [J].
Chi, DS ;
Franklin, CC ;
Levine, DA ;
Akselrod, F ;
Sabbatini, P ;
Jarnagin, WR ;
DeMatteo, R ;
Poynor, EA ;
Abu-Rustum, NR ;
Barakat, RR .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 94 (03) :650-654
[8]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[9]   Does aggressive surgery only benefit patients with less advanced ovarian cancer? Results from an international comparison within the SCOTROC-1 Trial [J].
Crawford, SC ;
Vasey, PA ;
Paul, J ;
Hay, A ;
Davis, JA ;
Kaye, SB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (34) :8802-8811
[10]   Procedures required to accomplish complete cytoreduction of ovarian cancer: Is there a correlation with "biological aggressiveness" and survival? [J].
Eisenkop, SM ;
Spirtos, NM .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 82 (03) :435-441