Accounting for spatially variable resolution in electrical resistivity tomography through field-scale rock-physics relations

被引:31
作者
Singha, Kamini
Moysey, Stephen
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Geosci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Sch Environm, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1190/1.2209753
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
A number of issues impact electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) inversions: how ERT measurements sample the subsurface, the nature of subsurface heterogeneity, the geometry selected for data collection, the choice of data-misfit criteria, and regularization of the inverse problem. Lab-scale rock-physics models, typically used to estimate solute concentration from ERT, do not accommodate or account for these issues and therefore produce inaccurate geophysical estimates of solute concentrations. In contrast, the influence of measurement sensitivity and inversion artifacts can be captured by pixel-based rock-physics relationships, determined using numerical analogs that recreate the field-scale ERT experiment based on flow and transport modeling and a priori data. In the 2D synthetic example presented here, where ERT is used to monitor the transport of a saline tracer through the subsurface, improved estimates of concentration are obtained when field-scale rock-physics relationships based on numerical analogs are used.
引用
收藏
页码:A25 / A28
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics [J].
Archie, GE .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGICAL ENGINEERS, 1942, 146 :54-61
[2]   Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution-dependent limitations [J].
Day-Lewis, FD ;
Singha, K ;
Binley, AM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2005, 110 (B8) :1-17
[3]  
Deutsch C. V., 1992, GSLIB GEOSTATISTICAL
[4]  
HARBAUGH AW, 1996, MODFLOW96
[5]   LARGE-SCALE NATURAL GRADIENT TRACER TEST IN SAND AND GRAVEL, CAPE-COD, MASSACHUSETTS .3. HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY VARIABILITY AND CALCULATED MACRODISPERSIVITIES [J].
HESS, KM ;
WOLF, SH ;
CELIA, MA .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1992, 28 (08) :2011-2027
[6]  
Keller G.V., 1966, ELECT METHODS GEOPHY
[7]   Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models [J].
Kemna, A ;
Vanderborght, J ;
Kulessa, B ;
Vereecken, H .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2002, 267 (3-4) :125-146
[8]   A framework for inferring field-scale rock physics relationships through numerical simulation [J].
Moysey, S ;
Singha, K ;
Knight, R .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2005, 32 (08) :1-4
[9]   Geostatistical analysis of ground-penetrating radar data: A means of describing spatial variation in the subsurface [J].
Rea, J ;
Knight, R .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1998, 34 (03) :329-339
[10]   ELECTROMAGNETIC DETERMINATION OF SOIL-WATER CONTENT - MEASUREMENTS IN COAXIAL TRANSMISSION-LINES [J].
TOPP, GC ;
DAVIS, JL ;
ANNAN, AP .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1980, 16 (03) :574-582