Expanding exergy analysis to account for ecosystem products and services

被引:141
作者
Hau, JL [1 ]
Bakshi, BR [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es034513s
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Exergy analysis is a thermodynamic approach used for analyzing and improving the efficiency of chemical and thermal processes. It has also been extended for life cycle assessment and sustainability evaluation of industrial products and processes. Although these extensions recognize the importance of capital and labor inputs and environmental impact, most of them ignore the crucial role that ecosystems play in sustaining all industrial activity. Decisions based on approaches that take nature for granted continue to cause significant deterioration in the ability of ecosystems to provide goods and services that are essential for every human activity. Accounting for nature's contribution is also important for determining the impact and sustainablility of industrial activity. In contrast, emergy analysis, a thermodynamic method from systems ecology, does account for ecosystems, but has encountered a lot of resistance and criticism, particularly from economists, physicists, and engineers. This paper expands the engineering concept of Cumulative Exergy Consumption (CEC) analysis to include the contribution of ecosystems, which leads to the concept of Ecological Cumulative Exergy Consumption (ECEC). Practical challenges in computing ECEC for industrial processes are identified and a formal algorithm based on network algebra is proposed. ECEC is shown to be closely related to emergy, and both concepts become equivalent if the analysis boundary, allocation method, and approach for combining global energy inputs are identical. This insight permits combination of the best features of emergy and exergy analysis, and shows that most of the controversial aspects of emergy analysis need not hinder its use for including the exergetic contribution of ecosystems. Examples illustrate the approach and highlight the potential benefits of accounting for nature's contribution to industrial activity.
引用
收藏
页码:3768 / 3777
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Adriaanse A., 1997, RESOURCE FLOWS MAT B
[2]  
[Anonymous], WORLD RES 2000 2001
[3]   ECONOMIC-GROWTH, CARRYING-CAPACITY, AND THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
ARROW, K ;
BOLIN, B ;
COSTANZA, R ;
DASGUPTA, P ;
FOLKE, C ;
HOLLING, CS ;
JANSSON, BO ;
LEVIN, S ;
MALER, KG ;
PERRINGS, C ;
PIMENTEL, D .
SCIENCE, 1995, 268 (5210) :520-521
[4]   Exergy, waste accounting, and life-cycle analysis [J].
Ayres, RU ;
Ayres, LW ;
Martinas, K .
ENERGY, 1998, 23 (05) :355-363
[5]  
Bejan Adrian., 1995, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM
[6]   On measuring economic values for nature [J].
Bockstael, NE ;
Freeman, AM ;
Kopp, RJ ;
Portney, PR ;
Smith, VK .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (08) :1384-1389
[7]   Emergy measures of carrying capacity to evaluate economic investments [J].
Brown, MT ;
Ulgiati, S .
POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 22 (05) :471-501
[8]   Two aspects of consumption: Using an energy-based measure of degradation to advance the theory and implementation of industrial ecology [J].
Connelly, L ;
Koshland, CP .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 1997, 19 (03) :199-217
[9]   The value of the exergetic life cycle assessment besides the LCA [J].
Cornelissen, RL ;
Hirs, GG .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 43 (9-12) :1417-1424
[10]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260