The potato Lhca3.St.1 promoter confers high and stable transgene expression in chrysanthemum, in contrast to CaMV-based promoters

被引:23
作者
Annadana, S
Mlynárová, L
Udayakumar, M
de Jong, J
Nap, JP
机构
[1] Plant Res Int, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Agr Sci Bangalore, Dept Crop Physiol, Bangalore 560065, Karnataka, India
关键词
35 S promoter; Dendranthema; high expression; MARs; molecular breeding; stable expression;
D O I
10.1023/A:1015212312928
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The enhanced cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (dCaMV) promoter and the potato Lhca3.St.1 promoter were evaluated for their expression abilities in chrysanthemum. The promoters were fused to the beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene with and without flanking matrix-associated regions (MARs). They were transferred into chrysanthemum via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The quantitative evaluation of GUS activity in a total of 127 independently derived transformants established that in chrysanthemum the Lhca3.St.1 promoter was 175 fold more active in the leaves than the dCaMV promoter was. The latter was as poor in expression as the single CaMV promoter. The use of such CaMV-based promoters in the genetic engineering of chrysanthemum should be discouraged when high levels of transgene expression are desired. No clear influence of the presence of MARs was observed on the variability of GUS gene expression, in contrast to earlier studies in tobacco. This may indicate a possible plant species dependent activity of MAR elements. Lhca3.St.1 promoter-driven GUS activity was relatively higher in the stem of chrysanthemum and proved stable over extensive time periods. Therefore this potato promoter is attractive to obtain high expression levels in chrysanthemum.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 344
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, PLANT TISSUE CULT BI
[2]   PHENOTYPIC DIFFERENCES IN TRANSGENIC PLANTS OF CHRYSANTHEMUM [J].
BENETKA, V ;
PAVINGEROVA, D .
PLANT BREEDING, 1995, 114 (02) :169-173
[3]   NUCLEAR-DNA AMOUNTS IN ANGIOSPERMS [J].
BENNETT, MD ;
SMITH, JB .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1976, 274 (933) :227-274
[4]  
Boase MR, 1998, IN VITRO CELL DEV-PL, V34, P46
[5]   Chrysanthemum cultivar Agrobacterium interactions revealed by GUS expression time course experiments [J].
Boase, MR ;
Butler, RC ;
Borst, NK .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 1998, 77 (1-2) :89-107
[6]  
Burchi G., 1995, Journal of Genetics and Breeding, V49, P163
[7]   Gametophytic expression of GUS activity controlled by the potato Lhca3.St.1 promoter in tobacco pollen [J].
Conner, AJ ;
Mlynarova, L ;
Stiekema, WJ ;
Nap, JP .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1999, 50 (338) :1471-1479
[8]  
Courtney-Gutterson N., 1993, Acta Horticulturae, P57
[9]   MODIFICATION OF FLOWER COLOR IN FLORISTS CHRYSANTHEMUM - PRODUCTION OF A WHITE-FLOWERING VARIETY THROUGH MOLECULAR-GENETICS [J].
COURTNEYGUTTERSON, N ;
NAPOLI, C ;
LEMIEUX, C ;
MORGAN, A ;
FIROOZABADY, E ;
ROBINSON, KEP .
BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 12 (03) :268-271
[10]   STABLE EXPRESSION OF THE GUS REPORTER GENE IN CHRYSANTHEMUM DEPENDS ON BINARY PLASMID T-DNA [J].
DEJONG, J ;
MERTENS, MMJ ;
RADEMAKER, W .
PLANT CELL REPORTS, 1994, 14 (01) :59-64