A strategy for diagnosing and interpreting hydrological model nonstationarity

被引:142
作者
Westra, Seth [1 ]
Thyer, Mark [1 ]
Leonard, Michael [1 ]
Kavetski, Dmitri [1 ]
Lambert, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Civil Environm & Min Engn, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; UNCERTAINTY; CALIBRATION; STATIONARITY; MULTIPERIOD; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1002/2013WR014719
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents a strategy for diagnosing and interpreting hydrological nonstationarity, aiming to improve hydrological models and their predictive ability under changing hydroclimatic conditions. The strategy consists of four elements: (i) detecting potential systematic errors in the calibration data; (ii) hypothesizing a set of "nonstationary" parameterizations of existing hydrological model structures, where one or more parameters vary in time as functions of selected covariates; (iii) trialing alternative stationary model structures to assess whether parameter nonstationarity can be reduced by modifying the model structure; and (iv) selecting one or more models for prediction. The Scott Creek catchment in South Australia and the lumped hydrological model GR4J are used to illustrate the strategy. Streamflow predictions improve significantly when the GR4J parameter describing the maximum capacity of the production store is allowed to vary in time as a combined function of: (i) an annual sinusoid; (ii) the previous 365 day rainfall and potential evapotranspiration; and (iii) a linear trend. This improvement provides strong evidence of model nonstationarity. Based on a range of hydrologically oriented diagnostics such as flow-duration curves, the GR4J model structure was modified by introducing an additional calibration parameter that controls recession sbehavior and by making actual evapotranspiration dependent only on catchment storage. Model comparison using an information-theoretic measure (the Akaike Information Criterion) and several hydrologically oriented diagnostics shows that the GR4J modifications clearly improve predictive performance in Scott Creek catchment. Based on a comparison of 22 versions of GR4J with different representations of nonstationarity and other modifications, the model selection approach applied in the exploratory period (used for parameter estimation) correctly identifies models that perform well in a much drier independent confirmatory period.
引用
收藏
页码:5090 / 5113
页数:24
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Board, 2013, WAT ALL PLAN W MOUNT
[2]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[3]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[4]   THE ROLE OF THE POSTAUDIT IN MODEL VALIDATION [J].
ANDERSON, MP ;
WOESSNER, WW .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1992, 15 (03) :167-173
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, ESTIMATING IMPACT CU
[6]  
Bates B., 2008, IPCC Technical Paper
[7]  
6
[8]  
Bergstrom S., 1995, Computer models of watershed hydrology., P443
[9]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[10]  
Beven K., 1995, Computer models of watershed hydrology., P627