Clinical manifestations of hand eczema compared by etiologic classification and irritation reactivity to SLS

被引:7
作者
Kang, YC [1 ]
Lee, S [1 ]
Ahn, SK [1 ]
Choi, EH [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Wonju Coll Med, Dept Dermatol, Wonju 220701, Kangwon Do, South Korea
关键词
hand eczema; SLS; skin barrier; transepidermal water loss;
D O I
10.1111/j.1346-8138.2002.tb00312.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Hand eczema is a common skin disease. Because of its variable etiologies and clinical manifestations, it is difficult to determine the etiology from the clinical manifestation. Among the contact allergens, nickel is the most common. Patients with hand eczema and a nickel allergy have a poorer prognosis than patients Without a nickel allergy,. The reason is still uncertain; suggestions include persistent exposure to nickel or a weak skin barrier. The purpose of our study was to identify the characteristic clinical manifestations by etiology and to compare the skin barrier state between patients with nickel allergies and those without them. Ninety-three patients were classified into 4 types; irritation contact type, allergic contact type, atopic type and mixed type. After the sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) test to compare the skin barrier state, visual score and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were measured and analyzed statistically. From this study, it was not possible to ascertain a statistical difference, however a few characteristic clinical manifestations according to etiology, can be stated. There was no difference in the visual scoring system or the TEWL after the SLS irritation test between the nickel-allergy group and the non-allergy, group. Therefore, we believe that the poor prognosis of hand eczema with nickel allergy, may be due to the nickel allergy, itself rather than skin barrier state.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 483
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
AGNER T, 1991, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V71, P296
[2]   SODIUM LAURYL SULFATE FOR IRRITANT PATCH TESTING - A DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY USING BIOENGINEERING METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF SKIN IRRITATION [J].
AGNER, T ;
SERUP, J .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1990, 95 (05) :543-547
[3]   SKIN SUSCEPTIBILITY IN UNINVOLVED SKIN OF HAND ECZEMA PATIENTS AND HEALTHY CONTROLS [J].
AGNER, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1991, 125 (02) :140-146
[4]  
AYNUR A, 1997, CONTACT DERMATITIS, V36, P278
[5]   Cutaneous reactivity of the hands in nickel-sensitive patients with hand eczema [J].
Banfield, CC ;
Basketter, DA ;
Powell, SM .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1998, 38 (06) :316-318
[6]  
BATTER DA, 1998, CONTACT DERMATITIS, V38, P253
[7]  
BIRGITTA M, 1990, CONTACT DERMATITIS, V23, P6
[8]   PROGNOSIS IN NICKEL ALLERGY AND HAND ECZEMA [J].
CHRISTENSEN, OB .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1982, 8 (01) :7-15
[9]  
DEPACKE K, 2001, COSMETIC DERMATITIS, V114, P337
[10]   HAND DERMATITIS - PRACTICAL MANAGEMENT AND CURRENT CONCEPTS [J].
EPSTEIN, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1984, 10 (03) :395-424