Shape analysis of breast masses in mammograms via the fractal dimension

被引:19
作者
Nguyen, Thanh A. [1 ]
Rangayyan, Rangaraj M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Fac Elect & Comp Engn, Calgary, AB, Canada
来源
2005 27TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-7 | 2005年
关键词
box-counting method; breast cancer; breast masses; contour analysis; fractal analysis; fractal dimension; ruler method; shape analysis; signatures of contours;
D O I
10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1617159
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Masses due to benign breast diseases and tumors due to breast cancer present significantly different shapes on mammograms. In general, malignant tumors appear with rough and complex boundaries or contours, whereas benign masses present smooth, round, or oval contours. Fractal analysis may be used to derive shape features to perform pattern classification of breast masses and tumors. Several procedures have been proposed to compute the fractal dimension of various types of objects or regions of interest in biomedical images, among which the box-counting and ruler methods are popular. In this study, we applied the two methods mentioned above to compute the fractal dimension of both the two-dimensional (2D) contours of breast masses and tumors, as well as their one-dimensional (1D) signatures. A comparative analysis was performed to assess the performance of the two methods of computing the fractal dimension and the two methods of representing the boundaries of masses. It was observed that analysis of the 2D contour representation with the ruler method resulted in the highest classification accuracy of up to 0.946, as indicated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The results indicate that the fractal dimension can serve as a good shape feature for the benign-versus-malignant classification of breast masses in mammograms.
引用
收藏
页码:3210 / 3213
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
*ALB CANC BOARD, 2001, SCREEN TEST ALB PROG
[2]  
ALTO H, 2005, IN PRESS J ELECT IMA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1983, New York
[4]  
[Anonymous], MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGE A
[5]  
COELHO RC, 1996, P S GRAS COMP GRAF P, P353
[6]   FRACTAL PHYSIOLOGY [J].
DEERING, W ;
WEST, BJ .
IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE, 1992, 11 (02) :40-46
[7]  
Dubuc B., 1987, Proceedings of the SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, V845, P241, DOI 10.1117/12.976511
[8]   FRACTAL DIMENSION IN THE ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL IMAGES [J].
FORTIN, C ;
KUMARESAN, R ;
OHLEY, W ;
HOEFER, S .
IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE, 1992, 11 (02) :65-71
[9]   Fractal characteristics of tumor vascular architecture during tumor growth and regression [J].
Gazit, Y ;
Baish, JW ;
Safabakhsh, N ;
Leunig, M ;
Baxter, LT ;
Jain, RK .
MICROCIRCULATION-LONDON, 1997, 4 (04) :395-402
[10]  
GOLDBERGER AL, 1990, SCI AM, V262, P43