Environmentally benign manufacturing: Observations from Japan, Europe and the United States

被引:267
作者
Gutowski, T
Murphy, C
Allen, D
Bauer, D
Bras, B
Piwonka, T
Sheng, P
Sutherland, J
Thurston, D
Wolff, E
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Mech Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Ctr Energy & Environm Resources, Austin, TX 78758 USA
[3] Univ Texas, Dept Chem Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[5] Georgia Inst Technol, George W Woodruff Sch Mech Engn, Syst Realizat Lab, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[6] Univ Alabama, MCTC, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[7] McKinsey & Co Inc, Austin, TX 78701 USA
[8] Michigan Technol Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
[9] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[10] Bradley Univ, Coll Engn Environm Sustainabil & Innovat, Peoria, IL 61625 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.10.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A recent international panel study (Gutowski T, Murphy C, Allen D, Bauer D, Bras B, Piwonka T, Sheng P, Sutherland J, Thurston D, Wolff E. WTEC Panel Report on: Environmentally Benign Manufacturing (EBM), 2000 on the web at; http://itri. loyola.edu/ebm/ and http://www.wtec.org/ebm/) finds Environmentally Benign Manufacturing (EBM) emerging as a significant competitive dimension between companies. With differing views on future developments, companies, especially large international companies, are positioning themselves to take advantage of emerging environmental trends. Among Japanese companies visited, the panel observed an acute interest in using the environmental advantages of their products and processes to enhance their competitive position in the market. In the northern European countries visited, the panel saw what could be interpreted as primarily a protectionist posture; that is, the development of practices and policies to enhance the well-being of EU countries, that could act as barriers to outsiders. In the U.S., the panel found a high degree of environmental awareness among the large international companies, most recently in response to offshore initiatives, mixed with skepticism. In this article, we survey EBM practices at leading firms, rate the competitiveness of the three regions visited, and close with observations of change since the study. Based upon these results, major research questions are then posed. In sum, the study found evidence that U.S. firms may be at a disadvantage due in part to a lack of coherent national goals in such areas as waste management, global warming, energy efficiency and product take back. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
*AAAS, 2000, ATL POP ENV
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, The Machine that Changed the World
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, WEIGHT NATIONS
[4]  
ARAMOVITZ J, 2000, STATE WORLD 2000
[5]   LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS - A CRITIQUE [J].
AYRES, RU .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 1995, 14 (3-4) :199-223
[6]  
BARE JC, 2003, J IND ECOLOGY, V0006
[7]  
BAUER D, 1999, ENV BENIGN MANUFACTU
[8]   Greening products: a framework for product chain management [J].
Boons, F .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2002, 10 (05) :495-505
[9]  
BRADSHER K, 2001, NY TIMES 0407
[10]  
Brown L., 2002, EARTH POLICY READER