Immune responses of goats against foot-and-mouth disease quadrivalent vaccine: comparison of double oil emulsion and aluminium hydroxide gel vaccines in eliciting immunity

被引:50
作者
Patil, PK
Bayry, J
Ramakrishna, C
Hugar, B
Misra, LD
Natarajan, C
机构
[1] Indian Vet Res Inst, Bangalore 560024, Karnataka, India
[2] Hop Broussais, INSERM, U 430, F-75014 Paris, France
[3] Vet Hosp, Kumsi, Shimoga, India
关键词
foot-and-mouth disease; goats; vaccine; Montanide ISA 206;
D O I
10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00184-6
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The epidemiological role of small ruminants in foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreaks has been generally neglected. Although, the disease in these species is sub-clinical in nature, their role as virus carriers represents a reservoir for further infection and spread of disease. Data on the usefulness of polyvalent FMD vaccine (FMDV) in goats is scant. Thus, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the benefits of a highly potent polyvalent FMDV in goats. In the present investigations, FMDV quadrivalent double oil emulsion (Montanide ISA 206) vaccines were tested in goats at reduced doses of 2 ml per animal (antigen payload 3.5 mug per serotype per dose). The oil adjuvant elicited superior immune response at any given period than aluminium hydroxide gel (AGS) vaccine and the rapidity of development of response was quicker. The duration of immunity also appeared to be maintained for long period. The differences in immune response between two adjuvant groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The differences were apparent even in kinetics of immune response. Unlike cattle, goats were found to be late responders for oil-adjuvanted vaccine. Our results indicate possible universal usage of double oil emulsion vaccines for disease control programs irrespective of species of animals. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2781 / 2789
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   ROLE OF SHEEP AND GOATS IN EPIZOOTIOLOGY OF FOOT-AND-MOUTH-DISEASE IN KENYA [J].
ANDERSON, EC ;
DOUGHTY, WJ ;
ANDERSON, J .
JOURNAL OF HYGIENE, 1976, 76 (03) :395-402
[2]  
Bahnemann H. G., 1974, Bulletin de l'Office International des Epizooties, V81, P1335
[3]   The role of small ruminants in the epidemiology and transmission of foot-and-mouth disease [J].
Barnett, PV ;
Cox, SJ .
VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 158 (01) :6-13
[4]   International bank for foot-and-mouth disease vaccine: Assessment of Montanide ISA 25 and ISA 206, two commercially available oil adjuvants [J].
Barnett, PV ;
Pullen, L ;
Williams, L ;
Doel, TR .
VACCINE, 1996, 14 (13) :1187-1198
[5]  
BARNETT PV, 1992, STABILITY POTENCY ST
[6]   DEVELOPMENTS IN FOOT-AND-MOUTH-DISEASE VACCINES [J].
BARTELING, SJ ;
VREESWIJK, J .
VACCINE, 1991, 9 (02) :75-88
[7]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SERUM ANTIBODY-TITERS AND PROTECTION FROM FOOT AND MOUTH-DISEASE IN PIGS AFTER OIL EMULSION VACCINATION [J].
BLACK, L ;
FRANCIS, MJ ;
RWEYEMAMU, MM ;
UMEHARA, O ;
BOGE, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION, 1984, 12 (04) :379-389
[8]  
BOLDRINI GM, 1978, VET REC, V102, P194
[9]  
Bomford R., 1997, VACCINE MANUAL PRODU, P277
[10]   NEW APPROACHES TO VACCINATION AGAINST FOOT-AND-MOUTH-DISEASE [J].
BROWN, F .
VACCINE, 1992, 10 (14) :1022-1026