Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:405
作者
Chou, Roger [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Fu, Rongwei [1 ,5 ]
Carrino, John A. [2 ]
Deyo, Richard A. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Oregon Evidence Based Practice Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Family Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
PRIMARY-CARE PATIENTS; LUMBAR SPINE; PATIENT EXPECTATIONS; CLINICAL GUIDELINES; EUROPEAN GUIDELINES; RADIOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; RADICULOPATHY; HETEROGENEITY; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60172-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background Some clinicians do lumbar imaging routinely or in the absence of historical or clinical features suggestive Of serious low-back problems. We investigated the effects of routine, immediate lumbar imaging versus usual clinical Care without immediate imaging on clinical outcomes in patients with low-back pain and no indication of serious underlying conditions. Methods We analysed randomised controlled trials that compared immediate lumbar imaging (radiography, MRI, or CT) versus usual clinical care without immediate imaging for low-back pain. These trials reported pain or function (primary outcomes), quality of life, mental health, overall patient-reported improvement (based on various scales), and patient satisfaction in care received. Six trials (n=1804) met inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed by two independent reviewers with criteria adapted from the Cochrane Back Review Group. Meta-analyses were done with a random effects model. Findings We did not record significant differences between immediate lumbar imaging and usual care without 3 months, standardised mean difference 0.19, immediate imaging for primary outcomes at either short-term (lip to 95% CI -0 . 01 to 0 . 39 for pain and 0 . 11, -0.29 to 0.50 for function, negative values favour routine imaging) or long-term (6-12 months, -0.04,-0.15 to 0.07 For pain and 0 . 01, -0.17 to 0 . 19 for function) follow-up. Other outcomes did not differ significantly. Trial quality, use of different imaging methods, and duration of low-back pain did not affect the results, but analyses were limited by small numbers of trials. Results are most applicable to acute or subacute low-back pain assessed in primary-care settings. Interpretation Lumbar imaging for low-back pain without indications of serious underlying conditions does not improve clinical outcomes. Therefore, clinicians should refrain from routine, immediate lumbar imaging in patients with acute or subacute low-back pain and without features suggesting a serious underlying condition. Funding American Pain Society.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 472
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]
Chapter 4 - European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain [J].
Airaksinen, O. ;
Brox, J. I. ;
Cedraschi, C. ;
Hildebrandt, J. ;
Klaber-Moffett, J. ;
Kovacs, F. ;
Mannion, A. F. ;
Reis, S. ;
Staal, J. B. ;
Ursin, H. ;
Zanoli, G. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (Suppl 2) :S192-S300
[2]
[Anonymous], HLTH TECHNOLOGY ASSE
[3]
Effects of diagnostic information, per se, on patient outcomes in acute radiculopathy and low back pain [J].
Ash, L. M. ;
Modic, M. T. ;
Obuchowski, N. A. ;
Ross, J. S. ;
Brant-Zawadzki, M. N. ;
Grooff, P. N. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2008, 29 (06) :1098-1103
[4]
Bigos SJ, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL
[5]
Bombardier C, 2001, J RHEUMATOL, V28, P431
[6]
Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders - Summary and general recommendations [J].
Bombardier, C .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3100-3103
[7]
Patterns of ordering diagnostic tests for patients with acute low back pain [J].
Carey, TS ;
Garrett, J ;
Curtis, P ;
Darter, J ;
DeFriese, G ;
Fryer, J ;
Hadler, N ;
Hunter, G ;
Joines, J ;
Jackman, A ;
Kalsbeek, W ;
McLaughlin, C ;
Konrad, T ;
Ricketts, T ;
Taylor, D ;
McNutt, R ;
Smucker, D .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 125 (10) :807-+
[8]
PHYSICIAN VARIATION IN DIAGNOSTIC TESTING FOR LOW-BACK-PAIN - WHO YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET [J].
CHERKIN, DC ;
DEYO, RA ;
WHEELER, K ;
CIOL, MA .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1994, 37 (01) :15-22
[9]
Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the American college of physicians and the American pain society [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Qaseem, Amir ;
Snow, Vincenza ;
Casey, Donald ;
Cross, J. Thomas, Jr. ;
Shekelle, Paul ;
Owens, Douglas K. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 147 (07) :478-491
[10]
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, V2nd