Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quantitative 20-year synopsis and a network meta-analysis

被引:175
作者
Trikalinos, Thomas A. [1 ]
Alsheikh-Ali, Alawi A. [2 ]
Tatsioni, Athina
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K. [3 ]
Kent, David M.
机构
[1] Tufts Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Ctr Clin Evidence Synth, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Tufts Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[3] Ann Arbor VA Med Ctr, VA Hlth Serv Res & Dev Ctr Excellence, Ann Arbor, MI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; CHRONIC STABLE ANGINA; BARE-METAL STENTS; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; MEDICAL THERAPY; HEART-DISEASE; ANGIOPLASTY; TRIALS; STRATEGIES; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60319-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Over the past 20 years, percutaneous transluminal balloon coronary angioplasty (PTCA), bare-metal stents (BMS), and drug-eluting stents (DES) succeeded each other as catheter-based treatments for coronary artery disease. We undertook a systematic overview of randomised trials comparing these interventions with each other and with medical therapy in patients with non-acute coronary artery disease. Methods We searched Medline for trials contrasting at least two of the four interventions (PTCA, BMS, DES, and medical therapy). Eligible outcomes were death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, target lesion or vessel revascularisation, and any revascularisation. Random effects meta-analyses summarised head-to-head (direct) comparisons, and network meta-analyses integrated direct and indirect evidence. Findings 61 eligible trials (25388 patients) investigated four of six possible comparisons between the four interventions; no trials directly compared DES with medical therapy or PTCA. In all direct or indirect comparisons, succeeding advancements in percutaneous coronary intervention did not produce detectable improvements in deaths or myocardial infarction. The risk ratio (RR) for indirect comparisons between DES and medical therapy was 0.96 (95% CI 0.60-1-52) for death and 1.15 (0.73-1.82) for myocardial infarction. By contrast, we recorded sequential significant reductions in target lesion or vessel revascularisation with BMS compared with PTCA (RR 0.68 [0-60.0.77]) and with DES compared with BMS (0.44 [0.35-0.56]). The RR for the indirect comparison between DES and PTCA for target lesion or vessel revascularisation was 0.30 (0.17-0.51). Interpretation Sequential innovations in the catheter-based treatment of non-acute coronary artery disease showed no evidence of an effect on death or myocardial infarction when compared with medical therapy. These results lend support to present recommendations to optimise medical therapy as an initial management strategy in patients with this disease.
引用
收藏
页码:911 / 918
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI - A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making [J].
Antman, EM ;
Cohen, M ;
Bernink, PJLM ;
McCabe, CH ;
Horacek, T ;
Papuchis, G ;
Mautner, B ;
Corbalan, R ;
Radley, D ;
Braunwald, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (07) :835-842
[2]   A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials of drug-eluting stents [J].
Babapulle, MN ;
Joseph, L ;
Bélisle, P ;
Brophy, JM ;
Eisenberg, MJ .
LANCET, 2004, 364 (9434) :583-591
[3]   The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: If A bests B and B bests Cinseparate trials, is A better than C? [J].
Baker S.G. ;
Kramer B.S. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2 (1) :1-5
[4]   Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease [J].
Boden, William E. ;
O'Rourke, Robert A. ;
Teo, Koon K. ;
Hartigan, Pamela M. ;
Maron, David J. ;
Kostuk, William J. ;
Knudtson, Merril ;
Dada, Marcin ;
Casperson, Paul ;
Harris, Crystal L. ;
Chaitman, Bernard R. ;
Shaw, Leslee ;
Gosselin, Gilbert ;
Nawaz, Shah ;
Title, Lawrence M. ;
Gau, Gerald ;
Blaustein, Alvin S. ;
Booth, David C. ;
Bates, Eric R. ;
Spertus, John A. ;
Berman, Daniel S. ;
Mancini, G. B. John ;
Weintraub, William S. ;
Boden, W. ;
O'Rourke, R. ;
Teo, K. ;
Hartigan, P. ;
Weintraub, W. ;
Maron, D. ;
Mancini, J. ;
Weintraub, W. ;
Boden, W. ;
O'Rourke, R. ;
Teo, K. ;
Hartigan, P. ;
Knudtson, M. ;
Maron, D. ;
Bates, E. ;
Blaustein, A. ;
Booth, D. ;
Carere, R. ;
Ellis, S. ;
Gosselin, G. ;
Gau, G. ;
Jacobs, A. ;
King, S., III ;
Kostuk, W. ;
Harris, C. ;
Spertus, J. ;
Peduzzi, P. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (15) :1503-1516
[5]   Evidence for use of coronary Stents - A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis [J].
Brophy, JM ;
Belisle, P ;
Joseph, L .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (10) :777-786
[6]   Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus medical treatment for non-acute coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials [J].
Bucher, HC ;
Hengstler, P ;
Schindler, C ;
Guyatt, GH .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7253) :73-77
[7]   The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Bucher, HC ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Griffith, LE ;
Walter, SD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (06) :683-691
[8]   Randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow- and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary artery lesions [J].
Colombo, A ;
Drzewiecki, J ;
Banning, A ;
Grube, E ;
Hauptmann, K ;
Silber, S ;
Dudek, D ;
Fort, S ;
Schiele, F ;
Zmudka, K ;
Guagliumi, G ;
Russell, ME .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (07) :788-794
[9]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[10]   Efficacy or effectiveness? [J].
Ernst, E. ;
Pittler, M. H. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 260 (05) :488-490