Effects of directional microphone and adaptive multichannel noise reduction algorithm on cochlear implant performance

被引:43
作者
Chung, King [1 ]
Zeng, Fan-Gang
Acker, Kyle N.
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.2258500
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Although cochlear implant (CI) users have enjoyed good speech recognition in quiet, they still have difficulties understanding speech in noise. We conducted three experiments to determine whether a directional microphone and an adaptive multichannel noise reduction algorithm could enhance Cl performance in noise and whether Speech Transmission Index (STI) can be used to predict CI performance in various acoustic and signal processing conditions. In Experiment 1, CI users listened to speech in noise processed by 4 hearing aid settings: omni-directional microphone, omni-directional microphone plus noise reduction, directional microphone, and directional microphone plus noise reduction. The directional microphone significantly improved speech recognition in noise. Both directional microphone and noise reduction algorithm improved overall. preference. In Experiment 11, normal hearing individuals listened to the recorded speech produced by 4- or 8-channel CI simulations. The 8-channel simulation yielded similar speech recognition results as in Experiment 1, whereas the 4-channel simulation produced no significant difference among the 4 settings. In Experiment III, we examined the relationship between STIs and speech recognition. The results suggested that STI could predict actual and simulated Cl speech intelligibility with acoustic degradation and the directional microphone, but not the noise reduction algorithm. Implications for intelligibility enhancement are discussed. (c) 2006 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:2216 / 2227
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Amlani A M, 2001, J Am Acad Audiol, V12, P202
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, HEAR J
[3]  
Bentler Ruth A, 2005, J Am Acad Audiol, V16, P473, DOI 10.3766/jaaa.16.7.7
[4]  
Bray V., 2001, HEAR REV, V8, P48
[5]   Utilizing hearing aid directional microphones and noise reduction algorithms to improve speech understanding and listening preferences for cochlear implant users [J].
Chung, K ;
Zeng, FG ;
Waltzman, S .
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, 2004, 1273 :89-92
[6]   Using hearing aid directional microphones and noise reduction algorithms to enhance cochlear implant performance [J].
Chung, K ;
Zeng, FG ;
Waltzman, S .
ACOUSTICS RESEARCH LETTERS ONLINE-ARLO, 2004, 5 (02) :56-61
[7]  
Chung King, 2004, Trends Amplif, V8, P83, DOI 10.1177/108471380400800302
[8]  
Cord Mary T, 2002, J Am Acad Audiol, V13, P295
[9]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN 2 MEASURES OF AIDED BINAURAL ADVANTAGE [J].
COX, RM ;
BISSET, JD .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1984, 49 (04) :399-408
[10]   Mechanisms of vowel recognition for Ineraid patients fit with continuous interleaved sampling processors [J].
Dorman, MF ;
Loizou, PC .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1997, 102 (01) :581-587