Reducing long-term remedial costs by transport modeling optimization

被引:31
作者
Becker, David
Minsker, Barbara
Greenwald, Robert
Zhang, Yan
Harre, Karla
Yager, Kathleen
Zheng, Chunmiao
Peralta, Richard
机构
[1] USA, Corps Engineers, Hazardous Tox & Radioact Waste Ctr Expertise, Omaha, NE 68144 USA
[2] Minsker Consulting, Champaign, IL 61821 USA
[3] GeoTrans Inc, Freehold, NJ 07728 USA
[4] USN, Naval Facilities Engn Serv Ctr, Code ESC414, Port Hueneme, CA 93043 USA
[5] US EPA, Off Superfund Remediat & Technol Innovat, ECA OEME, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA
[6] Univ Alabama, Dept Geol Sci, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[7] Utah State Univ, Dept Biol & Irragat Engn, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00242.x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 [理学];
摘要
The Department of Defense (DoD) Environmental Security Technology Certification Program and the Environmental Protection Agency sponsored a project to evaluate the benefits and utility of contaminant transport simulation-optimization algorithms against traditional (trial and error) modeling approaches. Three pump-and-treat facilities operated by the DoD were selected for inclusion in the project. Three optimization formulations were developed for each facility and solved independently by three modeling teams (two using simulation-optimization algorithms and one applying trial-and-error methods). The results clearly indicate that simulation-optimization methods are able to search a wider range of well locations and flow rates and identify better solutions than current trial-and-error approaches. The solutions found were 5% to 50% better than those obtained using trial-and-error (measured using optimal objective function values), with an average improvement of similar to 20%. This translated into potential savings ranging from $600,000 to $10,000,000 for the three sites. In nearly all cases, the cost savings easily outweighed the costs of the optimization. To reduce computational requirements, in some cases the simulation-optimization groups applied multiple mathematical algorithms, solved a series of modified subproblems, and/or fit "meta-models" such as neural networks or regression models to replace time-consuming simulation models in the optimization algorithm. The optimal solutions did not account for the uncertainties inherent in the modeling process. This project illustrates that transport simulation-optimization techniques are practical for real problems. However, applying the techniques in an efficient manner requires expertise and should involve iterative modification to the formulations based on interim results.
引用
收藏
页码:864 / 875
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
ALY AH, 1997, 9709 ERC
[2]
FUTURE PATHS FOR INTEGER PROGRAMMING AND LINKS TO ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE [J].
GLOVER, F .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1986, 13 (05) :533-549
[3]
Glover F., 1990, ORSA Journal on Computing, V2, P4, DOI [10.1287/ijoc.1.3.190, 10.1287/ijoc.2.1.4]
[4]
Goldberg DavidE., 1989, Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning
[5]
Harbaugh A.W., 1996, 96486 USGS
[6]
Holland JH, 1992, ADAPTATION NATURAL A, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/1090.001.0001
[7]
EQUATION OF STATE CALCULATIONS BY FAST COMPUTING MACHINES [J].
METROPOLIS, N ;
ROSENBLUTH, AW ;
ROSENBLUTH, MN ;
TELLER, AH ;
TELLER, E .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1953, 21 (06) :1087-1092
[8]
MINSKER B, 2003, APPL FLOW TRANSPORT
[9]
*NAV FAC ENG COMM, 2003, SP2129ENV
[10]
PERALTA RC, 1999, 8 WELL CS 10 PUMP ST