Tax reform and welfare measurement: Do we need demand system estimation?

被引:65
作者
Banks, J
Blundell, R
Lewbel, A
机构
[1] UCL, LONDON, ENGLAND
[2] BRANDEIS UNIV, WALTHAM, MA 02254 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2235517
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The exact measurement of the welfare costs of tax and price reform requires a detailed knowledge of individual preferences. Typically, first order approximations of welfare costs are calculated avoiding detailed knowledge of substitution effects. We drive second order approximations which, unlike first order approximations, require knowledge of the distribution of substitution elasticities. This paper asks to what extent simple approximations can be used to measure the welfare costs of tax reform and evaluates the magnitude of the biases for a plausible size tax reform. In our empirical examples first order approximations display systematic biases; second order approximations always work well.
引用
收藏
页码:1227 / 1241
页数:15
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.2307/1881737
[2]   MEASUREMENT OF INEQUALITY [J].
ATKINSON, AB .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1970, 2 (03) :244-263
[3]  
BANKS J, 1996, IN PRESS REV EC STAT
[4]   MONEY METRIC UTILITY - A HARMLESS NORMALIZATION [J].
BLACKORBY, C ;
DONALDSON, D .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1988, 46 (01) :120-129
[5]  
DEATON A, 1980, AM ECON REV, V70, P312
[6]  
FELDSTEIN MS, 1972, AM ECON REV, V62, P32
[7]   COMMUNITY PREFERENCE FIELDS [J].
Gorman, W. M. .
ECONOMETRICA, 1953, 21 (01) :63-80
[8]  
JORGENSEN DW, 1982, ADV ECONOMETRICS, V1
[9]   HOUSEHOLD EQUIVALENCE SCALES AND WELFARE COMPARISONS [J].
LEWBEL, A .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1989, 39 (03) :377-391
[10]  
MAYSHAR J, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P793