Diversity and Susceptibility of Enterococcus Isolated from Cattle before and after Harvest

被引:12
作者
Fluckey, W. M. [1 ]
Loneragan, G. H. [2 ]
Warner, R. D. [3 ]
Echeverry, A. [1 ]
Brashears, M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Anim & Food Sci, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] W Texas A&M Univ, Dept Agr Sci, Feedlot Res Grp, Canyon, TX 79016 USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Family & Community Med, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA
关键词
VANCOMYCIN-RESISTANT ENTEROCOCCI; FOOD ANIMALS; FAECIUM; HEALTH; GENES;
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X-72.4.766
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
To investigate evidence of cross-contamination and to determine patterns of antimicrobial drug susceptibility of Enterococcus isolates in a commercial cattle processing system, samples were collected from 60 cattle shipped to a commercial abattoir. Enterococcus isolates were recovered from fecal and hide samples collected immediately before shipment from a feedlot to the abattoir, from postexsanguination hide samples at the abattoir, and from carcass samples collected after hide removal (preevisceration) and in the cooler. Of the fecal samples, 53.9% were culture positive for Enterococcus. Of hide samples collected at the feedlot, 77.8% were positive for Enterococcus, significantly lower (P < 0.01) than the proportion of hides that were culture positive at the abattoir (96.1%). For preevisceration carcass samples, Enterococcus was recovered from 58.3% of carcasses. Only 8.3% of the carcasses sampled in the cooler yielded Enterococcus. Resistance among Enterococcus isolates was common regardless of the type or location of sample from which the isolate was recovered. All 279 Enterococcus isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial drug, and 179 (64.2%) of these isolates were resistant to at least six drugs. The most common resistance was to chloramphenicol (100% of isolates) followed by flavomycin (90.3%), lincomycin (87.8%), tylosin (78.5%), erythromycin (76.3%), tetracycline (58.9%), quinupristin-dalfopristin (47.7%), bacitracin (17.9), streptomycin (9.0%), ciprofloxacin (1.4%), linezolid (0.7%), and salinomycin (0.4%). Enterococcus isolates also were characterized using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to evaluate molecular similarities. Similar or indistinguishable electrophoresis patterns were found among isolates recovered at the feedlot and in the plant, providing evidence that feedlot-origin bacterial isolates are being transferred from cattle to carcasses within the processing environment through cross-contamination.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 774
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
AARESTRUP FM, 2006, FOODBORNE DIS, P405
[2]   Public health consequences of use of antimicrobial agents in food animals in the United States [J].
Anderson, AD ;
Nelson, JM ;
Rossiter, S ;
Angulo, FJ .
MICROBIAL DRUG RESISTANCE, 2003, 9 (04) :373-379
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, PERFORMANCE STANDARD
[4]   Acquired macrolide resistance genes in pathogenic Neisseria spp. isolated between 1940 and 1987 [J].
Cousin, S ;
Whittington, WLH ;
Roberts, MC .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 47 (12) :3877-3880
[5]   MEASURES OF THE AMOUNT OF ECOLOGIC ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SPECIES [J].
DICE, LR .
ECOLOGY, 1945, 26 (03) :297-302
[6]   Effectiveness of levofloxacin for adult community-acquired pneumonia caused by macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae:: Integrated results from four open-label, multicenter, phase III clinical trials [J].
Fogarty, CM ;
Greenberg, RN ;
Dunbar, L ;
Player, R ;
Marrie, TJ ;
Kojak, CM ;
Morgan, N ;
Williams, RR .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 23 (03) :425-439
[7]  
HUDSON CR, 2002, 42 INT SCI C ANT AG
[8]  
Hunt CP, 1998, BRIT J BIOMED SCI, V55, P149
[9]  
*I FOOD TECHN, 2006, COMPR REV FOOD SCI F, V5, P48
[10]   Comparative analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism and pulsed field gel electrophoresis in a hospital outbreak and subsequent endemicity of ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium [J].
Jureen, R ;
Harthug, S ;
Sornes, S ;
Digranes, A ;
Willems, RJL ;
Langeland, N .
FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 40 (01) :33-39