Semi-automated flow cytometric analysis of CD34-expressing hematopoietic cells in peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products

被引:17
作者
Gutensohn, K
Carrero, I
Krueger, W
Kroeger, N
Schäfer, P
Luedemann, K
Kuehnl, P
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Tranfus Med Transplantat Immunol, Bone Marrow Transplantat Ctr, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Med Microbiol & Immunol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39111220.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The measurement of CD34+ cells is the most important step in the quality control of peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products. For this purpose, flow cytometry is applied. Recently, a new test kit has been introduced for the enumeration of CD34-expressing cells, in combination with software support for semi-automation of data acquisition and analysis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study evaluated the ProCOUNT kit. Ninety samples obtained from peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products from 39 patients with hemato-oncologic diseases were analyzed. For data acquisition and analysis, ProCOUNT software was used. Data comparison was performed with parallel measurements according to the International Society for Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) guidelines and the German reference protocol for analysis of CD34-expressing cells. RESULTS: Correlation of the German and ISHAGE techniques was excellent (r(2) = 0.99). The initial correlation coefficient of ProCOUNT analysis with the German protocol was r(2) = 0.89. In 21 (23.3%) of 90 ProCOUNT analyses, a warning message was encountered from the ProCOUNT software. Following manual reevaluation of these data with CellQUEST software, a correlation of r(2) = 0.96 with the German protocol and r(2) = 0.97 with the ISHAGE analyses was obtained. ANOVA testing revealed significant differences between ProCOUNT and ISHAGE techniques (p<0.05) and between ProCOUNT and the German protocol (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference between ISHAGE and German protocol was observed (p = 0.19). CONCLUSION: The ProCOUNT kit and software for semi-automated data acquisition and analysis represents a further step toward standardization of CD34 cell quantitation in peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products. However, the occurrence of software warnings is high, and analysis or data reevaluation by experienced staff is still mandatory. Therefore, currently there is no definite advantage of the kit and software over the existing guidelines for CD34+ analysis in peripheral blood progenitor cell grafts.
引用
收藏
页码:1220 / 1226
页数:7
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] BENDER J, 1991, BLOOD, V12, P2591
  • [2] Bender J G, 1992, J Hematother, V1, P329, DOI 10.1089/scd.1.1992.1.329
  • [3] TRANSPLANTATION OF ALLOGENEIC PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELLS MOBILIZED BY RECOMBINANT HUMAN GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR
    BENSINGER, WI
    WEAVER, CH
    APPELBAUM, FR
    ROWLEY, S
    DEMIRER, T
    SANDERS, J
    STORB, R
    BUCKNER, CD
    [J]. BLOOD, 1995, 85 (06) : 1655 - 1658
  • [4] Brecher M E, 1996, J Hematother, V5, P227, DOI 10.1089/scd.1.1996.5.227
  • [5] Chang A, 1996, J Hematother, V5, P605, DOI 10.1089/scd.1.1996.5.605
  • [6] Chen C H, 1994, J Hematother, V3, P3, DOI 10.1089/scd.1.1994.3.3
  • [7] COMPARISON OF PURITY AND ENRICHMENT OF CD34(+) CELLS FROM BONE-MARROW, UMBILICAL-CORD AND PERIPHERAL-BLOOD (PRIMED FOR APHERESIS) USING 5 SEPARATION SYSTEMS
    DEWYNTER, EA
    COUTINHO, LH
    PEI, X
    MARSH, JCW
    HOWS, J
    LUFT, T
    TESTA, NG
    [J]. STEM CELLS, 1995, 13 (05) : 524 - 532
  • [8] PERIPHERAL-BLOOD PROGENITOR-CELL (PBPC) COUNTS DURING STEADY-STATE HEMATOPOIESIS ALLOW TO ESTIMATE THE YIELD OF MOBILIZED PBPC AFTER FILGRASTIM (R-METHUG-CSF)-SUPPORTED CYTOTOXIC CHEMOTHERAPY
    FRUEHAUF, S
    HAAS, R
    CONRADT, C
    MUREA, S
    WITT, B
    MOHLE, R
    HUNSTEIN, W
    [J]. BLOOD, 1995, 85 (09) : 2619 - 2626
  • [9] PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELLS FOR ALLOGRAFTING
    GOLDMAN, J
    [J]. BLOOD, 1995, 85 (06) : 1413 - 1415
  • [10] Gratama JW, 1997, CYTOMETRY, V30, P109, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19970615)30:3<109::AID-CYTO1>3.0.CO