Cytoreduction combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy in advanced/recurrent ovarian cancer patients: The experience of National Cancer Institute of Milan

被引:106
作者
Raspagliesi, F.
Kusamura, S.
Torres, J. C. Campos
de Souza, G. A.
Ditto, A.
Zanaboni, F.
Younan, R.
Baratti, D.
Mariani, L.
Laterza, B.
Deraco, M.
机构
[1] Natl Canc Inst, Dept Surg, Melanoma & Sarcoma Unit, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Natl Canc Inst, Dept Surg, Gynaecol Unit, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Natl Canc Inst, Dept Stat & Biometry, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Montreal, Ctr Hlth, CHUM, Dept Surg,Surg Oncol Unit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
EJSO | 2006年 / 32卷 / 06期
关键词
advanced ovarian cancer; locoregional therapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2006.03.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Aims: We report the effects of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) in the treatment of advanced/ recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) on survival, morbidity and mortality. Patients: Forty EOC patients were studied. Median age was 52.5 years (range: 30-68) and median follow-up 26.1 months (range: 0.3-117.6). Most patients presented advanced disease (stage III/IV). Previous systemic chemotherapy included cisplatin-based, taxol-based or taxol/platinum containing regimens. Results: After the CRS, 33 patients presented no macroscopic residual disease. Five-year overall survival was 15%; the mean overall and progression-free survivals were 41.4 and 23.9 months, respectively. The morbidity, toxicity and mortality rates were 5%, 15% and 0%, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that CRS + IPHP merits further evaluation by a formal prospective trial. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 675
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Bozzetti, F ;
Braga, M ;
Gianotti, L ;
Gavazzi, C ;
Mariani, L .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9292) :1487-1492
[2]
Chatzigeorgiou K, 2003, Zentralbl Gynakol, V125, P424
[3]
Second-line treatment and consolidation therapies in advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Conte, PF ;
Gadducci, A ;
Cianci, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2001, 11 :52-56
[4]
SURVIVAL AFTER 2ND-LOOK LAPAROTOMY IN ADVANCED OVARIAN EPITHELIAL CANCER - STUDY OF 86 PATIENTS [J].
DEGRAMONT, A ;
DROLET, Y ;
VARETTE, C ;
LOUVET, C ;
GONZALEZCANALL, G ;
KRULIK, M ;
CADY, J ;
PIGNE, A ;
MARPEAU, L ;
BARRAT, J ;
GALLOT, D ;
MALAFOSSE, M ;
DEBRAY, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 25 (03) :451-457
[5]
Peritoneal mesothelioma treated by induction chemotherapy, cytoreductive surgery, and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion [J].
Deraco, M ;
Casali, P ;
Inglese, MG ;
Baratti, D ;
Pennacchioli, E ;
Bertulli, R ;
Kusamura, S .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 83 (03) :147-153
[6]
Cytoreductive surgery followed by intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion in the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: A phase II clinical study [J].
Deraco, M ;
Rossi, CR ;
Pennacchioli, E ;
Guadagni, S ;
Somers, DC ;
Santoro, N ;
Raspagliesi, F ;
Kusamura, S ;
Vaglini, M .
TUMORI JOURNAL, 2001, 87 (03) :120-126
[7]
Gadducci A, 2000, ANTICANCER RES, V20, P1959
[8]
GERSHENSON DM, 1985, CANCER, V55, P1129, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850301)55:5<1129::AID-CNCR2820550531>3.0.CO
[9]
2-O
[10]
Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: A randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan [J].
Gordon, AN ;
Fleagle, JT ;
Guthrie, D ;
Parkin, DE ;
Gore, ME ;
Lacave, AJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (14) :3312-3322