Wind, Waves, and Wing Loading: Morphological Specialization May Limit Range Expansion of Endangered Albatrosses

被引:64
作者
Suryan, Robert M. [1 ]
Anderson, David J. [1 ]
Shaffer, Scott A. [2 ]
Roby, Daniel D. [3 ]
Tremblay, Yann [2 ]
Costa, Daniel P. [2 ]
Sievert, Paul R. [4 ]
Sato, Fumio [5 ]
Ozaki, Kiyoaki [5 ]
Balogh, Gregory R. [6 ]
Nakamura, Noboru [5 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Dept Biol, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Ecol & Evolut Biol, Long Marine Lab, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, USGS, Oregon Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[4] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Nat Resources Conservat, USGS, Massachusetts Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[5] Yamashina Inst Ornithol, Abiko, Chiba, Japan
[6] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Ecol Serv, Anchorage, AK USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2008年 / 3卷 / 12期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0004016
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Among the varied adaptations for avian flight, the morphological traits allowing large-bodied albatrosses to capitalize on wind and wave energy for efficient long-distance flight are unparalleled. Consequently, the biogeographic distribution of most albatrosses is limited to the windiest oceanic regions on earth; however, exceptions exist. Species breeding in the North and Central Pacific Ocean (Phoebastria spp.) inhabit regions of lower wind speed and wave height than southern hemisphere genera, and have large intrageneric variation in body size and aerodynamic performance. Here, we test the hypothesis that regional wind and wave regimes explain observed differences in Phoebastria albatross morphology and we compare their aerodynamic performance to representatives from the other three genera of this globally distributed avian family. In the North and Central Pacific, two species (short-tailed P. albatrus and waved P. irrorata) are markedly larger, yet have the smallest breeding ranges near highly productive coastal upwelling systems. Short-tailed albatrosses, however, have 60% higher wing loading (weight per area of lift) compared to waved albatrosses. Indeed, calculated aerodynamic performance of waved albatrosses, the only tropical albatross species, is more similar to those of their smaller congeners (black-footed P. nigripes and Laysan P. immutabilis), which have relatively low wing loading and much larger foraging ranges that include central oceanic gyres of relatively low productivity. Globally, the aerodynamic performance of short-tailed and waved albatrosses are most anomalous for their body sizes, yet consistent with wind regimes within their breeding season foraging ranges. Our results are the first to integrate global wind and wave patterns with albatross aerodynamics, thereby identifying morphological specialization that may explain limited breeding ranges of two endangered albatross species. These results are further relevant to understanding past and potentially predicting future distributional limits of albatrosses globally, particularly with respect to climate change effects on basin-scale and regional wind fields.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   At-sea distribution of waved albatrosses and the Galapagos Marine Reserve [J].
Anderson, DJ ;
Huyvaert, KP ;
Wood, DR ;
Gillikin, CL ;
Frost, BJ ;
Mouritsen, H .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 110 (03) :367-373
[2]  
ANDERSON DJ, 2008, ENDANGERED SPECIES R, DOI DOI 10.3354/ESR0089
[3]  
Baker J.D., 2006, Endangered Species Research, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.3354/ESR002021
[4]   Application of tracking and data-logging technology in research and conservation of seabirds [J].
Burger, Alan E. ;
Shaffer, Scott A. .
AUK, 2008, 125 (02) :253-264
[5]   FORAGING ENERGETICS OF GRAY-HEADED ALBATROSSES DIOMEDEA-CHRYSOSTOMA AT BIRD ISLAND, SOUTH GEORGIA [J].
COSTA, DP ;
PRINCE, PA .
IBIS, 1987, 129 (02) :149-158
[6]   Global circumnavigations: Tracking year-round ranges of nonbreeding albatrosses [J].
Croxall, JP ;
Silk, JRD ;
Phillips, RA ;
Afanasyev, V ;
Briggs, DR .
SCIENCE, 2005, 307 (5707) :249-250
[7]   Foraging destinations of three low-latitude albatross (Phoebastria) species [J].
Fernández, P ;
Anderson, DJ ;
Sievert, PR ;
Huyvaert, K .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2001, 254 :391-404
[8]  
HASEGAWA H, 1982, American Birds, V36, P806
[9]   Oceanographic habitats of two sympatric North Pacific albatrosses during the breeding season [J].
Hyrenbach, KD ;
Fernández, P ;
Anderson, DJ .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2002, 233 :283-301
[10]   SATELLITE TRACKING OF WANDERING ALBATROSSES [J].
JOUVENTIN, P ;
WEIMERSKIRCH, H .
NATURE, 1990, 343 (6260) :746-748