Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms

被引:124
作者
Thomassen, M. A. [2 ]
Dolman, M. A. [3 ]
van Calker, K. J.
de Boer, I. J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Anim Prod Syst Grp, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Anim Sci Grp, Business Unit Anim Prod, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Agr Econ Res Inst, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Economic indicators; Environmental indicators; Sustainability; Life cycle assessment; Dairy farms; FADN; Trade-off; MILK-PRODUCTION; ASSESSMENT LCA; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; EMISSIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.011
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071301 [植物生态学];
摘要
Sustainable dairy production requires farms that are economically viable, environmentally sound and socially acceptable. A low environmental impact of milk production is not necessarily associated with an economically viable farm. To gain insight into a possible "trade-off" between economic and environmental sustainability, the relation between the environmental and economic indicators of dairy farms was quantified, and farm characteristics that influence this relation were identified. Economic and environmental indicators were quantified for 119 specialized dairy farms in 2005, based on data from the Dutch Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN). Economic indicators used were: gross value added expressed per kg fat-and-protein-corrected milk (FPCM) or expressed per unit of labour, i.e. labour productivity. Environmental indicators used were: land use per kg FPCM, energy use per kg FPCM, global warming potential per kg FPCM, eutrophication and acidification potential per kg FPCM or per ha of land. Environmental indicators were deduced from a life cycle assessment. High labour productivity on dairy farms was associated with low on-farm energy use, total and on-farm land use, total and on-farm global warming potential, and total and off-farm acidification potential per kg FPCM. High labour productivity, however. was associated also with high on-farm eutrophication and acidification potential per hectare. From partial least squares regression analysis, it was concluded that relations between economic and environmental indicators were affected mainly by milk production per ha, annual milk production per cow, farm size, and amount of concentrates per kg FPCM. An increase in annual milk production per cow. for example, not only increased labour productivity, reduced energy use and global warming potential per kg FPCM but also, in the case of an unchanged stocking density, increased eutrophication and acidification per ha. To be economically and environmentally sustainable, animal production in the Netherlands, therefore, should focus on high animal productivity, i.e. high annual milk production per cow and efficient use of feed per kg milk, and moderate stocking density, provided that a good animal welfare standard is guaranteed. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:2278 / 2284
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE
[2]
Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of Swedish semi-hard cheese [J].
Berlin, J .
INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL, 2002, 12 (11) :939-953
[3]
*BUR HAFF, 2001, MINAS TAB 2001
[4]
Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA [J].
Canals, Llorenc Mila i ;
Bauer, Christian ;
Depestele, Jochen ;
Dubreuil, Alain ;
Knuchel, Ruth Freiermuth ;
Gaillard, Gerard ;
Michelsen, Ottar ;
Mueller-Wenk, Ruedi ;
Rydgren, Bernt .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (01) :5-15
[5]
Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system [J].
Casey, JW ;
Holden, NM .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2005, 86 (01) :97-114
[6]
Cederberg C, 2004, 728 SWED I FOOD BIOT
[7]
CEDERBERG C, 1998, 643 SWED I FOOD BIOT
[8]
*CVB, 2008, BOOK TABL 2008 FEED
[9]
Modelling representative and coherent Danish farm types based on farm accountancy data for use in environmental assessments [J].
Dalgaard, Randi ;
Halberg, Niels ;
Kristensen, Ib S. ;
Larsen, Inger .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 117 (04) :223-237
[10]
DEBONT CJA, 2003, REPORT SERIES AGR EC