Order effects in the assessment of quality of life in cancer patients

被引:34
作者
Cheung, YB
Wong, LC
Tay, MH
Toh, CK
Koo, WH
Epstein, R
Goh, C
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Div Clin Trials & Epidemiol Sci, Singapore 169610, Singapore
[2] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Therapeut Radiol, Singapore 169610, Singapore
[3] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Singapore 169610, Singapore
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Palliat Med, Singapore, Singapore
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cancer; health-related quality of life (HRQoL); order effect;
D O I
10.1023/B:QURE.0000037499.80080.07
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Methodological studies and outcome research often include several health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measurement scales in one questionnaire. Psychological studies have previously demonstrated that changing the sequential order of measurement scales within a questionnaire can alter the pattern of responses. Little is known, however, about whether there are order effects on the assessment of HRQoL in cancer patients. Here we address this issue in a study of 190 Singaporean cancer patients who were assessed using two different HRQoL instruments placed in alternating sequence within a questionnaire package. Measurement properties of the instruments, including the number of missing values, means, variability, known-group validity and internal consistency, were compared in the two samples representing different presentation orders. The HRQoL instruments administered in different sequential orders appeared to be equivalent in several aspects. No major effect of presentation order on outcomes was shown. The reasons and implications of the absence of an order effect are discussed. We conclude that presentation order is unlikely to alter the responses to the two HRQoL instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:1217 / 1223
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BOWLING A, 1997, RES METHODS HLTH, P241
[2]   Quick-FLIC - A short questionnaire for assessing quality of life of cancer patients [J].
Cheung, YB ;
Khoo, KS ;
Wong, ZW ;
See, HT ;
Toh, HC ;
Epstein, RJ ;
Ng, GY ;
Tan, SB .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2003, 42 (01) :36-42
[3]  
Chow S, 1992, DESIGN ANAL BIOAVAIL, P70
[4]   Does questionnaire structure influence response in postal surveys? [J].
Dunn, KM ;
Jordan, K ;
Croft, PR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (01) :10-16
[5]  
Efron B., 1994, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
[6]  
FAIRCLOUGH DL, 2002, DESIGN ANAL QUALITY, P37
[7]   Who's up first? Testing for order effects in structured interviews using a counterbalanced experimental design [J].
Jensen, PS ;
Watanabe, HK ;
Richters, JE .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 27 (06) :439-445
[8]   Comparison of two quality-of-life instruments for cancer patients:: The functional assessment of cancer therapy-general and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 [J].
Kemmler, G ;
Holzner, B ;
Kopp, M ;
Dünser, M ;
Margreiter, R ;
Greil, R ;
Sperner-Unterweger, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) :2932-2940
[9]   Structured and free-recall measures of worry themes: Effect of order of presentation on worry report [J].
Laberge, M ;
Fournier, S ;
Freeston, MH ;
Ladouceur, R ;
Provencher, MD .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2000, 14 (04) :429-436
[10]  
Levene H., 1960, CONTRIBUTIONS PROBAB, P292