A post-optimality analysis algorithm for multi-objective optimization

被引:36
作者
Venkat, V [1 ]
Jacobson, SH [1 ]
Stori, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
pareto optimality; post-optimality analysis; multi-objective optimization; greedy reduction algorithm; percentile levels;
D O I
10.1023/B:COAP.0000033968.55439.8b
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Algorithms for multi-objective optimization problems are designed to generate a single Pareto optimum (non-dominated solution) or a set of Pareto optima that reflect the preferences of the decision-maker. If a set of Pareto optima are generated, then it is useful for the decision-maker to be able to obtain a small set of preferred Pareto optima using an unbiased technique of filtering solutions. This suggests the need for an efficient selection procedure to identify such a preferred subset that reflects the preferences of the decision-maker with respect to the objective functions. Selection procedures typically use a value function or a scalarizing function to express preferences among objective functions. This paper introduces and analyzes the Greedy Reduction (GR) algorithm for obtaining subsets of Pareto optima from large solution sets in multi-objective optimization. Selection of these subsets is based on maximizing a scalarizing function of the vector of percentile ordinal rankings of the Pareto optima within the larger set. A proof of optimality of the GR algorithm that relies on the non-dominated property of the vector of percentile ordinal rankings is provided. The GR algorithm executes in linear time in the worst case. The GR algorithm is illustrated on sets of Pareto optima obtained from five interactive methods for multi-objective optimization and three non-linear multi-objective test problems. These results suggest that the GR algorithm provides an efficient way to identify subsets of preferred Pareto optima from larger sets.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 372
页数:16
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Craven B. D., 1988, Optimization, V19, P513, DOI 10.1080/02331938808843370
[2]  
DAUER J, 1997, ADV SENSITIVITY ANAL
[3]  
Eby D, 1999, EVOLUTIONARY DESIGN BY COMPUTERS, P167
[4]  
EISELT HA, 1987, OPERATIONS RES THEOR
[5]  
Fiacco A.V., 1983, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, V165
[6]  
FUJITA K, 1998, P ASME DES ENG TECHN
[7]   STABILITY IN VECTOR MAXIMIZATION - A SURVEY [J].
GAL, T ;
WOLF, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 25 (02) :169-182
[8]  
GAL T, 1995, POST OPTIMAL ANAL PA
[9]  
INSUA DR, 1990, LECT NOTES EC MATH S
[10]  
Keeney R.L., 1976, DECISIONS MULTIPLE O