A cascaded life cycle: reuse of electric vehicle lithium-ion battery packs in energy storage systems

被引:273
作者
Ahmadi, Leila [1 ]
Young, Steven B. [2 ]
Fowler, Michael [3 ]
Fraser, Roydon A. [4 ]
Achachlouei, Mohammad Ahmadi [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Canada, Energy Min & Environm, 1200 Montreal Rd, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Sch Environm Enterprise & Dev, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Chem Engn, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Waterloo, Dept Mech & Mechatron Engn, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[5] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Div Environm Strategies Res Fms, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Ctr Sustainable Commun CESC, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Electric vehicle; Energy storage systems (ESS); Life cycle assessment (LCA); Li-ion battery; Resource efficiency; Reuse; Second use; IMPACT; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-015-0959-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
083001 [环境科学];
摘要
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery packs recovered from end-of-life electric vehicles (EV) present potential technological, economic and environmental opportunities for improving energy systems and material efficiency. Battery packs can be reused in stationary applications as part of a "smart grid", for example to provide energy storage systems (ESS) for load leveling, residential or commercial power. Previous work on EV battery reuse has demonstrated technical viability and shown energy efficiency benefits in energy storage systems modeled under commercial scenarios. The current analysis performs a life cycle assessment (LCA) study on a Li-ion battery pack used in an EV and then reused in a stationary ESS. A complex functional unit is used to combine energy delivered by the battery pack from the mobility function and the stationary ESS. Various scenarios of cascaded "EV mobility plus reuse in stationary clean electric power scenarios" are contrasted with "conventional system mobility with internal combustion engine vehicles plus natural gas peaking power." Eight years are assumed for first use; with 10 years for reuse in the stationary application. Operational scenarios and environmental data are based on real time-of-day and time-of-year power use. Additional data from LCA databases are utilized. Ontario, Canada, is used as the geographic baseline; analysis includes sensitivity to the electricity mix and battery degradation. Seven environmental categories are assessed using ReCiPe. Results indicate that the manufacturing phase of the Li-ion battery will still dominate environmental impacts across the extended life cycle of the pack (first use in vehicle plus reuse in stationary application). For most impact categories, the cascaded use system appears significantly beneficial compared to the conventional system. By consuming clean energy sources for both use and reuse, global and local environmental stress reductions can be supported. Greenhouse gas advantages of vehicle electrification can be doubled by extending the life of the EV batteries, and enabling better use of off-peak low-cost clean electricity or intermittent renewable capacity. However, questions remain concerning implications of long-duration use of raw material resources employed before potential recycling. Li-ion battery packs present opportunities for powering both mobility and stationary applications in the necessary transition to cleaner energy. Battery state-of-health is a considerable determinant in the life cycle performance of a Li-ion battery pack. The use of a complex functional unit was demonstrated in studying a component system with multiple uses in a cascaded application.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 124
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]
Energy efficiency of Li-ion battery packs re-used in stationary power applications [J].
Ahmadi, Leila ;
Fowler, Michael ;
Young, Steven B. ;
Fraser, Roydon A. ;
Gaffney, Ben ;
Walker, Sean B. .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2014, 8 :9-17
[2]
Environmental feasibility of re-use of electric vehicle batteries [J].
Ahmadi, Leila ;
Yip, Arthur ;
Fowler, Michael ;
Young, Steven B. ;
Fraser, Roydon A. .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2014, 6 :64-74
[3]
[Anonymous], 2010, INT REF LIF CYCL DAT
[4]
[Anonymous], 2009, PROC IEEE AEROSP C, DOI DOI 10.1109/AERO.2009.4839676
[5]
Bennion K., 2009, Fuel savings from hybrid electric vehicles
[6]
Second life of electric vehicle batteries: relation between materials degradation and environmental impact [J].
Canals Casals, Lluc ;
Amante Garcia, Beatriz ;
Aguesse, Frederic ;
Iturrondobeitia, Amaia .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (01) :82-93
[7]
Cicconi P., 2012, 2012 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON 2012), P985, DOI 10.1109/EnergyCon.2012.6348293
[8]
Cocking J, 2015, INT J PROCESS SYSTEM
[9]
Cready E., 2003, Final Report Technical and Economic Feasibility of Applying Used EV Batteries in Stationary Applications a Study for the DOE Energy Storage Systems Program
[10]
Open-Loop Recycling: Criteria for Allocation Procedures [J].
Ekvall, Tomas ;
Tillman, Anne-Marie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 1997, 2 (03) :155-162