Effects of hypertonic saline, alternate day and daily rhDNase on healthcare use, costs and outcomes in children with cystic fibrosis

被引:42
作者
Suri, R
Grieve, R
Normand, C
Metcalfe, C
Thompson, S
Wallis, C
Bush, A
机构
[1] Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust, Dept Resp Paediat, London SW3 6NP, England
[2] Great Ormond St Hosp Sick Children, Resp Unit, London WC1N 3JH, England
[3] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1E 7HT, England
[4] Inst Publ Hlth, MRC, Biostat Unit, Cambridge CB2 2SR, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/thorax.57.10.841
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Daily recombinant human deoxyribonuclease (rhDNase) is an established but expensive treatment in cystic fibrosis (CF). An alternative lower cost therapy is hypertonic saline (HS), which has been shown to improve lung function in short term studies. This study compares the costs and consequences of daily rhDNase with alternate day rhDNase and HS in children with CF. Methods: In an open, randomised, crossover trial, 48 children with CF were allocated consecutively to 12 weeks of once daily 2.5 mg rhDNase, alternate day 2.5 mg rhDNase, and twice daily 5 ml 7% HS. Outcomes assessed included forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and quality of life. All healthcare resource use was prospectively recorded for each patient. Unit costs were collected and combined with resource use data to give the total health service costs per patient for each treatment strategy. Results: Daily rhDNase resulted in a significantly greater increase in mean FEV1 than HS (8%, 95% CI 2 to 14) but there was no significant difference in FEV1 between daily and alternate day rhDNase (2%, 95% CI-4 to 9). Over a 12 week period the mean incremental costs of daily rhDNase compared with HS was pound1409 (95% CI pound440 to pound2318), and the incremental cost of using daily rather than alternate day rhDNase was pound513 (95% CI -pound546 to pound1510). Conclusions: Daily rhDNase is more effective than 5 ml 7% HS twice daily delivered by jet nebuliser, but significantly increases healthcare costs. Administering rhDNase on an alternate day rather than a daily basis is as effective, with a potential for cost savings.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 846
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Altman DG, 1990, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, CROSSOVER TRIALS CLI
[3]  
BALLMANN M, 1998, PEDIATR PULM, V17, P343
[4]  
Briggs AH, 1999, Health Technol Assess, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.3310/HTA3020
[5]  
*BRIT MED ASS ROYA, 1999, BRIT NAT FORM, V38
[6]   rhDNase therapy for the treatment of cystic fibrosis patients with mild to moderate lung disease [J].
Christopher, F ;
Chase, D ;
Stein, K ;
Milne, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 24 (06) :415-426
[7]  
Davies J, 1997, PEDIATR PULM, V23, P243, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199704)23:4<243::AID-PPUL1>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-N
[9]   Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ [J].
Drummond, MF ;
Jefferson, TO .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7052) :275-283
[10]  
Eng PA, 1996, PEDIATR PULM, V21, P77, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199602)21:2<77::AID-PPUL3>3.3.CO