Flow cytometry beads rather than the antihuman globulin method should be used to detect HLA Class I IgG antibody (PRA) in cadaveric renal regraft candidates

被引:7
作者
Bryan, CF [1 ]
McDonald, SB [1 ]
Baier, KA [1 ]
Luger, AM [1 ]
Aeder, MI [1 ]
Murillo, D [1 ]
Muruve, NA [1 ]
Nelson, PW [1 ]
Shield, CF [1 ]
Warady, BA [1 ]
机构
[1] Midwest Transplant Network, Westwood, KS 66205 USA
关键词
Class IPRA; flow PRA; regrafts; renal;
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-0012.16.s7.2.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
HLA Class I antibody screening can be performed by flow cytometry using a mixture of 30 distinct bead populations each coated with the Class I antigen phenotype derived from different cell lines. In this study we compared the efficacy of Class I antibody screens done by flow cytometry beads with the antihuman globulin (AHG) method for patients awaiting cadaveric renal retransplantation. Class I panel reactive antibody (PRA) screening by flow cytometric beads of 21 regraft serum samples that had all been found to be negative by AHG DTT Class I PRA, revealed that 57.1% (12 of 21) had a flow Class I PRA of greater than or equal to 10%. Furthermore, when five regraft sera with an intermediate PRA were screened (mean AHG DTT PRA = 33.2 +/- 13%) the mean flow Class I PRA almost doubled (mean flow PRA = 72.4 +/- 10.2%) ( p < 0.01). When active UNOS waiting list regraft candidates, after several months of screening the Class I PRA by flow beads, were divided into the three PRA categories based on their peak flow Class I PRA value (0-20%, 21-79% and ≥ 80%), the incidence of a positive flow cross-match was 0%, 72% and 85% and the incidence of retransplantation was 60%, 22% and 10%, in each of these groups, respectively. These data provided our histocompatibility laboratory with the rationale to stop performing the AHG PRA and perform only the flow Class I PRA method for regraft candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 23
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   The relevance of donor T cell-directed immunoglobulin G in historic sera in the age of flow cytometry [J].
Avlonitis, VS ;
Chidambaram, V ;
Manas, DM ;
Cavanagh, G ;
Carter, V ;
Talbot, D .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (08) :1260-1263
[2]   Long-term graft survival is improved in cadaveric renal retransplantation by flow cytometric crossmatching [J].
Bryan, CF ;
Baier, KA ;
Nelson, PW ;
Luger, AM ;
Martinez, J ;
Pierce, GE ;
Ross, G ;
Shield, CF ;
Warady, BA ;
Aeder, MI ;
Helling, TS ;
Muruve, N .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (12) :1827-1832
[3]   Influence of an historically positive crossmatch on cadaveric renal transplantation [J].
Bryan, CF ;
Shield, CF ;
Warady, BA ;
Aeder, MI ;
Helling, TS ;
Luger, AM ;
Martinez, J ;
Nelson, PW ;
Pierce, GE ;
Ross, G ;
Muruve, N ;
Thien, ER .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 31 (1-2) :225-227
[4]  
ELLISON MD, 1994, 13 ANN AM SOC TRANSP
[5]   Sensitization and sensitivity - Defining the unsensitized patient [J].
Gebel, HM ;
Bray, RA .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (07) :1370-1374
[6]   Flow cross-matching identifies patients at risk for postoperative elaboration of cytotoxic antibodies [J].
Kimball, P ;
Rhodes, C ;
King, A ;
Fisher, R ;
Ham, J ;
Posner, M .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 65 (03) :444-446
[7]  
LeFor WM, 1996, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V10, P601
[8]  
Nelson PW, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P599
[9]   Flow cytometry crossmatching as a predictor of acute rejection in sensitized recipients of cadaveric renal transplants [J].
O'Rourke, RW ;
Osorio, RW ;
Freise, CE ;
Lou, CD ;
Garovoy, MR ;
Bacchetti, P ;
Ascher, NL ;
Melzer, JS ;
Roberts, JP ;
Stock, PG .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 14 (02) :167-173
[10]  
OGURA K, 1993, TRANSPLANTATION, V56, P294