Combined Androgen Blockade With Bicalutamide for Advanced Prostate Cancer Long-Term Follow-Up of a Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized Study for Survival

被引:166
作者
Akaza, Hideyuki [1 ]
Hinotsu, Shiro [2 ]
Usami, Michiyuki [3 ]
Arai, Yoichi [4 ]
Kanetake, Hiroshi [5 ]
Naito, Seiji [6 ]
Hirao, Yoshihiko [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Dept Urol, Inst Clin Med, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058577, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Dept Pharmacoepidemiol, Grad Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Urol, Osaka, Japan
[4] Tohoku Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Sendai, Miyagi 980, Japan
[5] Nagasaki Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Nagasaki 852, Japan
[6] Kyushu Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med Sci, Fukuoka 812, Japan
[7] Nara Med Univ, Dept Urol, Nara, Japan
关键词
prostate cancer; survival; combined androgen blockade; bicalutamide; luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist; clinical trial; immediate combined androgen blockade; deferred combined androgen blockade; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; MULTICENTER TRIAL; JAPANESE PATIENTS; HORMONE AGONIST; THERAPY; MONOTHERAPY; ANTIGEN; RECURRENCE; FLUTAMIDE; ONCOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.24395
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: A previously reported, double-blind, randomized, multicenter phase 3 trial in 205 patients with stage C/D prostate cancer compared combined androgen blockade (CAB) with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRH-A) plus bicalutamide 80 mg versus LHRH-A plus bicalutamide-matching placebo (LHRH-A monotherapy). The analysis at a median follow-up of 2.4 years indicated that CAB significantly (P < .001) prolonged the time to progression and the time to treatment failure. In the current report, survival data from a long-term follow-up (median, 5.2 years) were analyzed. METHODS: All deaths irrespective of cause and all prostate cancer-specific deaths were recorded. The data were analyzed using Cox regression analysis and the log-rank test. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 5.2 years, a significant overall survival advantage was observed in favor of CAB over LHRH-A monotherapy (Cox regression analysis: hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.99; P = .0498; log-rank test: P = .0425). The difference in cause-specific survival between the 2 groups was not significant. The achievement of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir concentration <= 1 ng/mL was a prognostic factor for improved survival. More patients attained PSA nadir concentrations <= 1 ng/mL with CAB compared with patients who received LHRH-A monotherapy (81.4% vs 33.7%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: CAB with bicalutamide 80 mg offered a significant overall survival benefit compared with LHRH-A monotherapy without reducing tolerability in patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer 2009;115:3437-45. (C) 2009 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:3437 / 3445
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Superior anti-tumor efficacy of bicalutamide 80 mg in combination with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist versus LHRH agonist monotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced prostate cancer: Interim results of a randomized study in Japanese patients [J].
Akaza, H ;
Yamaguchi, A ;
Matsuda, T ;
Igawa, M ;
Kumon, H ;
Soeda, A ;
Arai, Y ;
Usami, M ;
Naito, S ;
Kanetake, H ;
Ohashi, Y .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 34 (01) :20-28
[2]
AKAZA H, EFFICACY COMBINED AN
[3]
Current status and prospects of androgen depletion therapy for prostate cancer [J].
Akaza, Hideyuki .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2008, 22 (02) :293-302
[4]
Prostate-specific antigen dynamics predict risk of progression in advanced prostate cancer treated with bicalutamide plus castration [J].
Altwein, JE ;
Schmidt, A .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2002, 68 (04) :220-225
[5]
[Anonymous], GEN RUL CLIN PATH ST
[6]
Evaluation of quality of life in patients with previously untreated advanced prostate cancer receiving maximum androgen blockade therapy or LHRHa monotherapy: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative study [J].
Arai, Yoichi ;
Akaza, Hideyuki ;
Deguchi, Takashi ;
Fujisawa, Masato ;
Hayashi, Mikio ;
Hirao, Yoshihiko ;
Kanetake, Hiroshi ;
Naito, Seiji ;
Namiki, Mikio ;
Tachibana, Masaaki ;
Usami, Michiyuki ;
Ohashi, Yasuo .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 134 (12) :1385-1396
[7]
Dalesio O, 2000, LANCET, V355, P1491
[8]
Fourcade R.-O., 2004, UroOncology, V4, P5, DOI [10.1080/1561095042000191655, DOI 10.1080/1561095042000191655]
[9]
Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Humphreys, EB ;
Mangold, LA ;
Eisenberger, M ;
Dorey, FJ ;
Walsh, PC ;
Partin, AW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (04) :433-439
[10]
Hinotsu A, 1999, Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, V26, P657