Results From Four Rounds of Ovarian Cancer Screening in a Randomized Trial

被引:178
作者
Partridge, Edward
Kreimer, Aimee R.
Greenlee, Robert T.
Williams, Craig
Xu, Jian-Lun
Church, Timothy R.
Kessel, Bruce
Johnson, Christine C.
Weissfeld, Joel L.
Isaacs, Claudine
Andriole, Gerald L.
Ogden, Sheryl
Ragard, Lawrence R.
Buys, Saundra S.
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] NCI, Canc Prevent Div, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Marshfield Med Res & Educ Fdn, Marshfield, WI USA
[4] Informat Management Serv Inc, Rockville, MD USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Pacific Hlth Res Inst, Honolulu, HI USA
[7] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Detroit, MI USA
[8] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[9] Georgetown Univ, Vincent T Lombardi Canc Res Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[10] Washington Univ, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
[11] Univ Colorado, Ctr Canc, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[12] Westat Corp, Rockville, MD USA
[13] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
RISK;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819cda77
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To test whether annual screening with transvaginal ultrasonography and CA 125 reduces ovarian cancer mortality. METHODS: Data from the first four annual screens, denoted T0-T3, are reported. A CA 125 value at or above 35 units/mL or an abnormality on transvaginal ultrasonography was considered a positive screen. Diagnostic follow-up of positive screens was performed at the discretion of participants' physicians. Diagnostic procedures and cancers were tracked and verified through medical records. RESULTS: Among 34,261 screening arm women without prior oophorectomy, compliance with screening ranged from 83.1% (T0) to 77.6% (T3). Screen positivity rates declined slightly with transvaginal ultrasonography, from 4.6 at T0 to 2.9-3.4 at T1-T3; CA 125 positivity rates (range 1.4-1.8%) showed no time trend. Eighty-nine invasive ovarian or peritoneal cancers were diagnosed; 60 were screen detected. The positive predictive value (PPV) and cancer yield per 10,000 women screened on the combination of tests were similar across screening rounds (range 1.0-1.3% for PPV and 4.7-6.2 for yield); however, the biopsy (surgery) rate among screen positives decreased from 34% at T0 to 15-20% at T1-T3. The overall ratio of surgeries to screen-detected cancers was 19.5:1. Seventy-two percent of screen-detected cases were late stage (III/IV). CONCLUSION: Through four screening rounds, the ratio of surgeries to screen-detected cancers was high, and most cases were late stage. However, the effect of screening on mortality is as yet unknown.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 782
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CANC FACTS FIG 2007
[2]   Ovarian cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: Findings from the initial screen of a randomized trial [J].
Buys, SS ;
Partridge, E ;
Greene, MH ;
Prorok, PC ;
Reding, D ;
Riley, TL ;
Hartge, P ;
Fagerstrom, RM ;
Chia, D ;
Izmirlian, G ;
Fouad, M ;
Ragard, LR ;
Johnson, CC ;
Gohagan, JK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (05) :1630-1639
[3]   Transvaginal sonography as a screening method for the detection of early ovarian cancer [J].
DePriest, PD ;
Gallion, HH ;
Pavlik, EJ ;
Kryscio, RJ ;
vanNagell, JR .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1997, 65 (03) :408-414
[4]  
EINHORN N, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V80, P14
[5]   Risk of diagnosis of ovarian cancer after raised serum CA 125 concentration: A prospective cohort study [J].
Jacobs, IJ ;
Skates, S ;
Davies, AP ;
Woolas, RP ;
Jeyerajah, A ;
Weidemann, P ;
Sibley, K ;
Oram, DH .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7069) :1355-1358
[6]   A randomized study of screening for ovarian cancer: a multicenter study in Japan [J].
Kobayashi, H. ;
Yamada, Y. ;
Sado, T. ;
Sakata, M. ;
Yoshida, S. ;
Kawaguchi, R. ;
Kanayama, S. ;
Shigetomi, H. ;
Haruta, S. ;
Tsuji, Y. ;
Ueda, S. ;
Kitanaka, T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2008, 18 (03) :414-420
[7]   Prospective study using the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm to screen for ovarian cancer [J].
Menon, U ;
Skates, SJ ;
Lewis, S ;
Rosenthal, AN ;
Rufford, B ;
Sibley, K ;
MacDonald, N ;
Dawnay, A ;
Jeyarajah, A ;
Bast, RC ;
Oram, D ;
Jacobs, IJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (31) :7919-7926
[8]   Design of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial [J].
Prorok, PC ;
Andriole, GL ;
Bresalier, RS ;
Buys, SS ;
Chia, D ;
Crawford, ED ;
Fogel, R ;
Gelmann, EP ;
Gilbert, F ;
Hasson, MA ;
Hayes, RB ;
Johnson, CC ;
Mandel, JS ;
Oberman, A ;
O'Brien, B ;
Oken, MM ;
Rafla, S ;
Reding, D ;
Rutt, W ;
Weissfeld, JL ;
Yokochi, L ;
Gohagan, JK .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2000, 21 (06) :273S-309S
[9]  
Ries L., 2005, SEER CANC STAT REV 1
[10]  
Sato S, 2000, CANCER, V89, P582, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20000801)89:3<582::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO