Early Equivalence of Uncemented Press-fit and CompressA® Femoral Fixation

被引:64
作者
Farfalli, German L. [1 ]
Boland, Patrick J. [1 ]
Morris, Carol D. [1 ]
Athanasian, Edward A. [1 ]
Healey, John H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg,Orthopaed Surg Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
LIMB-SALVAGE SURGERY; DISTAL FEMUR; TUMOR ENDOPROSTHESES; MALIGNANT-TUMORS; FOLLOW-UP; KNEE RECONSTRUCTIONS; OSTEOGENIC-SARCOMA; RESECTION; OSTEOSARCOMA; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-009-0912-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Bone ingrowth promises more durable biologic fixation of megaprostheses. The relative performance of different types of fixation is unknown. We compared the fixation of two forms of biologically fixed femoral components: an intramedullary uncemented press-fit stem (UCS; Group 1, 50 patients) and a CompressA (R) uncemented fixation (CPS; Group 2, 41 patients). In Group 1, the overall Kaplan-Meier prosthetic survival rates were 85% at 5 and 71% at 10 years. Most failures were long-term developments. Aseptic loosening was the primary cause of failure. Stem diameters less than 13.5 mm and a diaphyseal/stem coefficient greater than 2.5 mm were associated with decreased prosthetic survival. In Group 2, the overall rate of CPS survival was 88% at 5 years. Failure of femoral fixation or fracture during the first year was the main reason for revision. Five-year survival rates were similar between the groups and we observed no difference in the functional success of the implants. We found no failures after 1-year followup in Group 2 (CPS). Any difference in prosthetic survival can only be proven by longer-term study or a randomized trial. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:2792 / 2799
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Effect of chemotherapy on initial compressive osselointegration of tumor endoprostheses [J].
Avedian, R. S. ;
Goldsby, R. E. ;
Kramer, M. J. ;
O'Donnell, R. J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (459) :48-53
[2]
Early distal femoral endoprosthetic survival:: cemented stems versus the Compress® stop implant [J].
Bhangu, A. A. ;
Kramer, M. J. ;
Grimer, R. J. ;
O'Donnell, R. J. .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2006, 30 (06) :465-472
[3]
Bickels J, 2002, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P225
[4]
Bini SA, 2000, ORTHOPEDICS, V23, P707
[5]
MODULAR UNCEMENTED PROSTHETIC RECONSTRUCTION AFTER RESECTION OF TUMORS OF THE DISTAL FEMUR [J].
CAPANNA, R ;
MORRIS, HG ;
CAMPANACCI, D ;
DELBEN, M ;
CAMPANACCI, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1994, 76B (02) :178-186
[6]
In vitro testing of a novel limb salvage prosthesis for the distal femur [J].
Cristofolini, L ;
Bini, S ;
Toni, A .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 13 (08) :608-615
[7]
ENNEKING WF, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P241
[8]
FINN HA, 1991, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P108
[9]
Aseptic loosening is uncommon with uncemented proximal tibia tumor prostheses [J].
Flint, Michael N. ;
Griffin, Anthony M. ;
Bell, Robert S. ;
Ferguson, Peter C. ;
Wunder, Jay S. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (450) :52-59
[10]
Freedman EL, 1997, ORTHOPEDICS, V20, P27