Ascertaining Maximal Voluntary Effort Production During Isokinetic Knee Strength Testing of Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Patients

被引:5
作者
Almosnino, Sivan [1 ,3 ]
Dvir, Zeevi [1 ,2 ]
Bardana, Davide D. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Diaconescu, Elena D. [3 ]
Stevenson, Joan M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Studies, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Stanley Steyer Sch Hlth Profess, Sackler Fac Med, Ramat Aviv, Israel
[3] Kingston Gen Hosp, Human Mobil Res Ctr, Syl & Molly Apps Med Res Ctr, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7, Canada
[4] Queens Univ, Div Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[5] Kingston Gen Hosp, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Strength; Knee; Dynamometry; Maximal Voluntary Contraction; SUBMAXIMAL EFFORT; MUSCLE STRENGTH; EXTENSION TESTS; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VARIABILITY; SINCERITY; EXERCISE; INJURY; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1097/PHM.0000000000000041
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100232 [康复医学];
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of prediction rules meant for declaration of efforts as being maximal or not during isokinetic strength testing in a cohort that underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Design: Thirty-six individuals performed four sets of six reciprocal concentric knee extension/flexion repetitions at a testing speed of 60 degrees per second through a 60-degree range of motion. The sets consisted of a maximal voluntary effort, two nonmaximal sincere efforts at 50% and 75% of self-perceived maximum, and a set attempting to feign or exaggerate thigh muscle strength deficiencies. Strength curve derived set internal consistency measures, namely, cross-correlation and percent root mean square difference scores, were inputted into the prediction rules, whose performance is reported as specificity and sensitivity percentages. Results: Dependent on the prediction rule used and when expressed on an individual participant basis, the corresponding specificity and sensitivity values ranged from 66.6% to 97.2% and 97.2% to 94.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Using the prediction rules presented in this investigation, clinicians may be able to ascertain maximal effort production during isokinetic testing in those who have undergone surgical reconstruction of their anterior cruciate ligament.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 181
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
Differentiating between types and levels of isokinetic knee musculature efforts [J].
Almosnino, Sivan ;
Stevenson, Joan M. ;
Day, Andrew G. ;
Bardana, Davide D. ;
Diaconescu, Elena D. ;
Dvir, Zeevi .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (06) :974-981
[2]
[Anonymous], 2013, APPL LOGISTIC REGRES
[3]
Ayalon M, 2002, ISOKINET EXERC SCI, V10, P145
[4]
Identification of feigned strength test of the knee extensors and flexors based on the shape of the isokinetic torque curve [J].
Ayalon, M ;
Rubinstein, M ;
Barak, Y ;
Dunsky, A ;
Ben-Sira, D .
ISOKINETICS AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2001, 9 (01) :45-50
[5]
Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: A meta-analysis [J].
Benjammse, A ;
Gokeler, A ;
van der Schans, CP .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2006, 36 (05) :267-288
[6]
Birmingham T.B., 1997, Physiotherapy Canada, V49, P184
[7]
Measurement variability and sincerity of effort: clinical utility of isokinetic strength coefficient of variation scores [J].
Birmingham, TB ;
Kramer, JF ;
Speechley, M ;
Chesworth, BM ;
MacDermid, J .
ERGONOMICS, 1998, 41 (06) :853-863
[8]
Identifying submaximal muscular effort: Reliability of difference scores calculated from isometric and isokinetic measurements [J].
Birmingham, TB ;
Kramer, JF .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1998, 87 (03) :1183-1191
[9]
DIFFERENTIATION OF MAXIMAL AND SUBMAXIMAL KNEE EXTENSION EFFORTS BY ISOKINETIC TESTING [J].
BOHANNON, RW ;
SMITH, MB .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1988, 3 (04) :215-218
[10]
Morphology of Hamstring Torque-Time Curves following ACL Injury and Reconstruction: Mechanisms and Implications [J].
Bryant, Adam L. ;
Clark, Ross A. ;
Pua, Yong-Hao .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2011, 29 (06) :907-914