Is insight important? Measuring capacity to change performance

被引:119
作者
Hays, RB [1 ]
Jolly, BC
Caldon, LJM
McCrorie, P
McAvoy, PA
McManus, IC
Rethans, JJ
机构
[1] James Cook Univ N Queensland, Sch Med, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Ctr Med & Hlth Sci Educ, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[3] Univ Sheffield, Acad Surg Oncol Unit, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ London St Georges Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Med & Hlth Care Educ, London SW17 0RE, England
[5] Gateshead & S Tyne Hlth Author, S Shields, England
[6] UCL, Res Ctr Med Educ, London, England
[7] Maastricht Univ, Skillslab, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
clinical competence; standards; physicians; family; education; medical; continuing; quality of health care;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01317.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Some doctors who perform poorly appear not to be aware of how their performance compares with accepted practice. The way that professionals maintain their existing expertise and acquire new knowledge and skills - that is, maintain their 'currency' of practice - requires a capacity to change. This capacity to change probably requires the individual doctor to possess insight into his or her performance as well as motivation to change. There may be a range of levels of insight in different individuals. At some point this reaches a level which is inadequate for effective self-regulation. Insight and performance may be critically related and there are instances where increasing insight in the presence of decreasing performance can also cause difficulties. Objective This paper presents an exploration into the nature of insight, its relationship to professional performance and its measurement as part of performance, reflecting the combined experiences of a group of experienced education researchers and the results of literature searches on insight and performance. Conclusion There may be individuals in whom insight is so lacking that they are beyond remediation. If there is a dichotomy between adequate and inadequate levels of insight, testing this could be a cost-effective way of determining where efforts for remediation should be focussed.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 971
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Amador XF, 1998, INSIGHT AND PSYCHOSIS, P15
[2]   The everyday functioning questionnaire: A new measure of cognitive and emotional status for neurosurgical outpatients [J].
Andrewes, DG ;
Hordern, C ;
Kaye, A .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 1998, 8 (04) :377-391
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, J Continuing Education Health Professions, DOI DOI 10.1002/CHP.4750090414
[4]  
[Anonymous], ANIMAL MIND
[5]  
BAHRAMI J, 2002, BR J GEN PRACT, V51, P876
[6]   Group peer review in psychiatry: The relationship to quality improvement and quality care [J].
Balla, M ;
Knothe, B ;
Lancaster, J ;
Prager, S ;
Beatson, J .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 30 (05) :653-659
[7]  
Beckett D., 2002, LIFE WORK LEARNING P
[8]  
Borduas F, 2001, J Contin Educ Health Prof, V21, P103, DOI 10.1002/chp.1340210207
[9]  
DAVIS DA, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V274, P700
[10]   Insight and treatment outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder [J].
Eisen, JL ;
Rasmussen, SA ;
Phillips, KA ;
Price, LH ;
Davidson, J ;
Lydiard, RB ;
Ninan, P ;
Piggott, T .
COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 42 (06) :494-497