Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocol microscopy images of bee brains

被引:453
作者
Rohlfing, T
Brandt, R
Menzel, R
Maurer, CR
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Image Guidance Labs, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Neurobiol, Berlin, Germany
[3] Indeed Visual Concepts GMBH, Berlin, Germany
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
atlas-based segmentation; atlas selection; nonrigid image; registration; bee brain; confocal microscopy imaging;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.010
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates strategies for atlas selection in atlas-based segmentation of three-dimensional biomedical images. Segmentation by intensity-based nonrigid registration to atlas images is applied to confocal microscopy images acquired from the brains of 20 bees. This paper evaluates and compares four different approaches for atlas image selection: registration to an individual atlas image (IND), registration to an average-shape atlas image (AVG), registration to the most similar image from a database of individual atlas images (SIM), and registration to all images from a database of individual atlas images with subsequent multi-classifier decision fusion (MUL). The MUL strategy is a novel application of multi-classifier techniques, which are common in pattern recognition, to atlas-based segmentation. For each atlas selection strategy, the segmentation performance of the algorithm was quantified by the similarity index (SI) between the automatic segmentation result and a manually generated gold standard. The best segmentation accuracy was achieved using the MUL paradigm, which resulted in a mean similarity index value between manual and automatic segmentation of 0.86 (AVG, 0.84; SIM, 0.82; IND, 0.81). The superiority of the MUL strategy over the other three methods is statistically significant (two-sided paired t test, P < 0.001). Both the MUL and AVG strategies performed better than the best possible SIM and IND strategies with optimal a posteriori atlas selection (mean similarity index for optimal SIM, 0.83; for optimal IND, 0.81). Our findings show that atlas selection is an important issue in atlas-based segmentation and that, in particular, multi-classifier techniques can substantially increase the segmentation accuracy. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1428 / 1442
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Ashburner J, 2000, THESIS U COLL LONDON
[2]   Segmentation of brain 3D MR images using level sets and dense registration [J].
Baillard, C ;
Hellier, P ;
Barillot, C .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2001, 5 (03) :185-194
[4]  
BRANDT R, 2004, UNPUB J COMP NEUROL
[5]   Consistent image registration [J].
Christensen, GE ;
Johnson, HJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 20 (07) :568-582
[6]   Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics [J].
Christensen, GE ;
Rabbitt, RD ;
Miller, MI .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 5 (10) :1435-1447
[7]   Automatic 3-D model-based neuroanatomical segmentation [J].
Collins, DL ;
Holmes, CJ ;
Peters, TM ;
Evans, AC .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 1995, 3 (03) :190-208
[8]   Automated hippocampal segmentation by regional fluid registration of serial MRI: Validation and application in Alzheimer's disease [J].
Crum, WR ;
Scahill, RI ;
Fox, NC .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 13 (05) :847-855
[9]   Automatic 3-D segmentation of internal structures of the head in MR images using a combination of similarity and free-form transformations: Part I, methodology and validation on normal subjects [J].
Dawant, BM ;
Hartmann, SL ;
Thirion, JP ;
Maes, F ;
Vandermeulen, D ;
Demaerel, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1999, 18 (10) :909-916
[10]   ELASTICALLY DEFORMING 3D ATLAS TO MATCH ANATOMICAL BRAIN IMAGES [J].
GEE, JC ;
REIVICH, M ;
BAJCSY, R .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1993, 17 (02) :225-236