The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT

被引:30
作者
Clavarino, AM
Janda, M
Hughes, KL
Del Mar, C
Tong, SL
Stanton, WR
Aitken, JF
Leggett, BA
Newman, B
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Sch Populat Hlth, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Ctr Hlth Res Publ Hlth, Kelvin Grove, Qld, Australia
[3] Queensland Canc Fund, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Ctr Gen Practice, Herston, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia
[6] Herston Med Sch, Royal Brisbane Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Herston, Qld, Australia
关键词
colorectal cancer; screening; FOBT; qualitative research;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.015
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Population-wide screening for people at average risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by faecal occult blood test (FOBT) is under consideration in Australia. Methods. Qualitative methods were used to examine the views of community members who did (n = 18) or did not (n = 12) participate in a pilot program of FOBT screening. In addition, views were obtained from general practitioners (GPs) and specialist gastroenterologists directly involved in the implementation of the program. Two focus group sessions were conducted with screening participants and interviews were conducted with nonparticipants, GPs and gastroenterologists. Results. The findings suggest that CRC screening by FOBT distributed to households by mail was well accepted by the community and by the medical practitioners involved in its implementation. The trial had little negative effect on general practice. Both medical practitioners and consumers raised concerns about the efficacy of FOBT screening. Medical practitioners were also concerned about the potential burden mass screening could place on the public (government-funded) health care sector. Conclusions. It would seem that CRC screening using FOBT will not enjoy unqualified support from the community or from medical practitioners involved in the continuum of screening. Information about the objectives of screening programs, in general, and the efficacy of FOBT screening in particular, needs to be provided to the community to ensure informed individual choice. (C) 2004 The Institute For Cancer Prevention and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 490
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
*AHTAC, 1997, COL CANC SCREEN
[2]  
*AIHW, 2003, CANC SER, V23
[3]  
[Anonymous], QUALITATIVE INQUIRY
[4]   VIEWS OF A GENERAL-POPULATION ON MASS-SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL-CANCER - THE BURGUNDY STUDY [J].
ARVEUX, P ;
DURAND, G ;
MILAN, C ;
BEDENNE, L ;
LEVY, D ;
DOAN, BDH ;
FAIVRE, J .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1992, 21 (05) :574-581
[5]   Screening for colorectal cancer: what is the most cost-effective approach? [J].
Bolin, TD ;
Lapsley, HM ;
Kormar, MG .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2001, 174 (06) :298-301
[6]   HEMOCCULT COMPLIANCE RATES AND REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE [J].
BOX, V ;
NICHOLS, S ;
LALLEMAND, RC ;
PEARSON, P ;
VAKIL, PA .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 1984, 98 (01) :16-25
[7]  
CAMERON LD, 1997, PERCEPTIONS HLTH ILL
[8]   Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner [J].
Cole, SR ;
Young, GP ;
Byrne, D ;
Guy, JR ;
Morcom, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2002, 9 (04) :147-152
[9]   Effect of dietary restriction on participation in faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer [J].
Cole, SR ;
Young, GP .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2001, 175 (04) :195-198
[10]   Colorectal cancer screening in average-risk, asymptomatic Australians [J].
Collett, JA ;
Olynyk, JK .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1998, 169 (01) :14-15