Current provision of rheumatology education for undergraduate nursing, occupational therapy and physiotherapy students in the UK

被引:19
作者
Almeida, C.
Clarke, B.
O'Brien, A.
Hammond, A.
Ryan, S.
Kay, L.
Hewlett, S.
机构
[1] Univ W England, Sch Adult Nursing, Bristol BS16 1DD, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England
[3] Univ Keele, Sch Hlth & Rehabil, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[4] Derbyshire Royal Infirm, Rheumatol Unit, Derby DE1 2QY, England
[5] Haywood Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Stoke On Trent ST6 7AG, Staffs, England
[6] Freeman Rd Hosp, Rheumatol Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE7 7DN, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
rheumatology; education; undergraduate; health professionals; nursing; physiotherapy; occupational therapy;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/kel008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objectives. Rheumatological conditions are common and all health professionals (HPs) therefore need sufficient knowledge and skills to manage patients safely and effectively. The aim of this study was to examine current undergraduate education in rheumatology for HPs in the UK. Methods. A questionnaire was sent to curriculum organizers and clinical placement officers for all undergraduate courses in adult nursing, occupational therapy (OT) and physiotherapy (PT) in the UK to ascertain the nature and amount of rheumatology theory and clinical exposure provided. Results. Of the 47 adult nursing, 26 OT and 30 PT undergraduate courses surveyed, 85-90% responded. Overall, rheumatology teaching is 5-10 h over 3 yr. Nursing students receive moderate/in-depth teaching on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in only 52% of courses (OT 91%, PT 96%) and on osteoarthritis (OA) in 63% (OT 91%, PT 92%). Clinical experience of RA is probably/definitely available in only 56% of nursing courses (OT 72%, PT 88%), with similar results in OA. Overall, nursing students receive the least rheumatology exposure, particularly in psychosocial issues and symptom management, while PT students receive the most. OT students have limited opportunities for clinical exposure to psychosocial and joint protection issues. Use of local rheumatology clinical HP experts is variable (18-93%) and cross-disciplinary exposure is limited (0-36%). Many educators consider their rheumatology training to be insufficient (nursing 50%, PT 42%, OT 24%). Conclusions. Rheumatology training for undergraduate HPs is limited in key areas and often fails to take advantage of local clinical expertise, with nursing students particularly restricted. Clinical HP experts should consider novel methods of addressing these shortfalls within the limited curriculum time available.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 873
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
[Anonymous], STAND PROF PRER NURS
[2]
*ART RES CAMP U BR, GRAD CERT RHEUM
[3]
*ASS RHEUM HLTH PR, 2005, STAND PRACT
[4]
CARR A, 2001, ARC C P 12 CHEST
[5]
Cassady J R, 1987, Nurs Health Care, V8, P39
[6]
Developing an evidence base for interdisciplinary learning: a systematic review [J].
Cooper, H ;
Carlisle, C ;
Gibbs, T ;
Watkins, C .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2001, 35 (02) :228-237
[7]
*COT, 2003, STAND ED PRER ED STA
[8]
*CSP, 2002, CURR FRAM
[9]
*DEP HLTH, NHS CAR
[10]
Department of Health, 2005, SUPP PEOPL LONG TERM