Self management of arthritis in primary care: randomised controlled trial

被引:148
作者
Buszewicz, Marta [1 ]
Rait, Greta
Griffin, Mark
Nazareth, Irwin
Patel, Anita
Atkinson, Angela
Barlow, Julie
Haines, Andy
机构
[1] UCL Royal Free & Univ Coll Med Sch, Dept Primary Care & Populat Sci, London N19 5LW, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Ctr Econ & Mental Hlth, London SE5 8AT, England
[3] Royal Victoria Infirm, Clin Res Facil, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4LP, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Coventry Univ, Interdisciplinary Res Ctr Hlth, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1E 7HT, England
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2006年 / 333卷 / 7574期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.38965.375718.80
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objective To evaluate clinical effectivcness of a self management programme for arthritis in patients in primary care with osteoarthritis. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting 74 general practices in the United Kingdom. Participants 812 patients aged 50 and over with osteoarthritis of hips or knees (or both) and pain or disability (or both). Intervention Participants were randomised to six sessions of self management of arthritis and an education booklet (intervention group) or the education booklet alone (control group). Main outcome measures Primary outcome was quality of life, as assessed by the short form health survey (SF-36). Several other physical mid psychosocial secondary outcomes were assessed. Data were collected at baseline, four months, and 12 months. Results Response rates were 80% and 76% at four and 12 months. The two groups showed significant differences at 12 months on die anxiety subscore of the hospital anxiety and depression scale (mean difference - 0.62, 95% confidence interval - 1.08 to. - 0.16). arthritis self efficacy scale for pain (0.98, 0.07 to 1.89), and self efficacy, for other aspects of management (1.58, 0.25 to 2.90). Results were similar for intention to treat and per protocol analyses. No significant difference was seen in number of visits to the general practitioner at 12 months. Conclusions The self management of arthritis programme reduced anxiety and improved participants' perceived self efficacy to manage symptoms, but it had no significant effect on pain, physical functioning, or contact with primary care.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 882A
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
*ARC, FACTF ARTHR GLANC
[2]
Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review [J].
Barlow, J ;
Wright, C ;
Sheasby, J ;
Turner, A ;
Hainsworth, J .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2002, 48 (02) :177-187
[3]
Barlow JH, 1998, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V37, P1315
[4]
Improving arthritis self-management among older adults: 'Just what the doctor didn't order' [J].
Barlow, JH ;
Williams, B ;
Wright, CC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 2 :175-186
[5]
Barlow JH, 1997, PSYCHOL HEAL MED, V2, P221, DOI DOI 10.1080/13548509708400580
[6]
Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care [J].
Bodenheimer, T ;
Lorig, K ;
Holman, H ;
Grumbach, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (19) :2469-2475
[7]
DONALDSON L, 2005, COMMUNICATION 0216
[8]
CRITERION VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE SF-36 IN A POPULATION-SAMPLE [J].
JENKINSON, C ;
WRIGHT, L ;
COULTER, A .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1994, 3 (01) :7-12
[9]
SHORT FORM-36 (SF-36) HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE - NORMATIVE DATA FOR ADULTS OF WORKING AGE [J].
JENKINSON, C ;
COULTER, A ;
WRIGHT, L .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 306 (6890) :1437-1440
[10]
Khaltaev N, 2003, ARTHRITIS RES THE S3, V5, P174