Numerical modelling of floodplain hydraulics and suspended sediment transport and deposition at the event scale in the middle river Elbe, Germany

被引:26
作者
Buettner, Olaf
Otte-Witte, Kai
Krueger, Frank
Meon, Guenther
Rode, Michael
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Seenforsch, D-39114 Magdeburg, Germany
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Soil Sci, D-39114 Magdeburg, Germany
[3] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Hydrol Modelling, D-39114 Magdeburg, Germany
来源
ACTA HYDROCHIMICA ET HYDROBIOLOGICA | 2006年 / 34卷 / 03期
关键词
flood; velocity; steady-state discharge; sedimentation rate; sediment trap;
D O I
10.1002/aheh.200500626
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of this case study was to calibrate and verify a detailed sediment transport model in a 4-kilometre stretch of the middle Elbe floodplains in Germany. The hydraulic RMA-2 model and the SED2d-WES sediment transport model were used. The sediment transport model was verified with a flood event by detailed measurements of surface water levels, flow velocities at six profiles, suspended sediment concentration and sediment deposition (by means of 10 sediment traps). Discharge was modelled for three steady-state conditions. Surface water levels could be calculated to an accuracy of less than 5 cm compared to measurements. The differences between calculated and measured velocities were with one exception smaller than 0.2 m/s (measured range 0.1...1.0 m/s). Simulated average sediment input amount to 35 g/(m(2) d) for the given flood event. The highest calculated sedimentation rates of 700 g/(m(2) d) (dry density 90 kg/m(2)) took place in backwaters and abandoned channels. Twenty-five percent of the deposited sediment settled in the backwaters (which only account for 13 percent of the area). The most sensitive parameters of the sediment transport model were the settling velocity and critical shear stress. The modelling approach allowed a realistic spatial distributed calculation of sediment inputs into the floodplain of the Elbe River.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 278
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Anderson M.G., 1996, FLOODPLAIN PROCESSES
[2]   Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data [J].
Aronica, G ;
Hankin, B ;
Beven, K .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1998, 22 (04) :349-365
[3]  
BUTTNER O, 1997, 5 DTSCH ANW ESRI, P225
[4]  
BUTTNER O, 2000, STOFFHAUSHALT AUENOK, P159
[5]  
Carling PA., 1992, Lowland floodplain rivers: Geomorphological perspectives
[6]  
Friese K, 2000, REMEDIATION ENGINEERING OF CONTAMINATED SOILS, P373
[7]  
HAMM L, 1997, COHESIVE SEDIMENTS, P449
[8]   The importance of spatial resolution in hydraulic models for floodplain environments [J].
Hardy, RJ ;
Bates, PD ;
Anderson, MG .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1999, 216 (1-2) :124-136
[9]   Modelling suspended sediment deposition on a fluvial floodplain using a two-dimensional dynamic finite element model [J].
Hardy, RJ ;
Bates, PD ;
Anderson, MG .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2000, 229 (3-4) :202-218
[10]  
Hoggan D.H., 1997, COMPUTER ASSISTED FL