Postfire management on forested public lands of the western United States

被引:179
作者
Beschta, RL [1 ]
Rhodes, JJ
Kauffman, JB
Gresswell, RE
Minshall, GW
Karr, JR
Perry, DA
Hauer, ER
Frissell, CA
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Engn, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Columbia River Intertribal Fish Commiss, Portland, OR 97232 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Forest & Rangeland Ecosyst Sci Ctr, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[5] Idaho State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Pocatello, ID 83209 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[8] Univ Montana, Flathead Lake Biol Stn, Polson, MT 59860 USA
[9] Pacific Rivers Council, Polson, MT 59860 USA
关键词
ecological principles; postfire treatments; restoration; salvage logging; wildland fire;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00495.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Forest ecosystems in the western United States evolved over many millennia in response to disturbances such as wildfires. Land use and management practices have altered these ecosystems, however including fire regimes in some areas. Forest ecosystems are especially vulnerable to postfire management practices because such practices may influence forest dynamics and aquatic systems for decades to centuries. Thus, there is an increasing need to evaluate the effect of postfire treatments from the perspective of ecosystem recovery. We examined, via the published literature and our collective experience, the ecological effects of some common postfire treatments. Based on this examination, promising postfire restoration measures include retention of large trees, rehabilitation of firelines and roads, and, in some cases, planting of native species. The following practices are generally inconsistent with efforts to restore ecosystem functions after fire: seeding exotic species, livestock grazing, placement of physical structures in and near stream channels, ground-based postfire logging, removal of large trees, and road construction. Practices that adversely affect soil integrity, persistence or recovery of native species, riparian functions, or water quality generally impede ecological recovery after fire. Although research provides a basis for evaluating the efficacy of postfire treatments, there is a continuing need to increase our understanding of the effects of such treatments within the context of societal and ecological goals for forested public lands of the western United States.
引用
收藏
页码:957 / 967
页数:11
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Agee J.K., 1993, FIRE ECOLOGY PACIFIC
[2]  
AlEspinosa F, 1997, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V49, P205, DOI 10.1006/jema.1995.0089
[3]  
Amaranthus M. P., 1993, RESTORATION ECOLOGY, V1, P188, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1526-100X.1993.TB00024.X
[4]  
AMARANTHUS MP, 1989, S FIR WAT MAN US DEP, P148
[5]  
[Anonymous], PNWGTR405 USDA FOR S
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GEN TECHNICAL REPORT
[7]  
[Anonymous], 39 CWWR U CAL
[8]  
[Anonymous], AM FISHERIES SOC SPE
[9]  
[Anonymous], AM FISH SOC
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CASCADING EFFECTS FI, DOI DOI 10.2737/RMRS-GTR-91