Why parents refuse childhood vaccination: a qualitative study using online focus groups

被引:113
作者
Harmsen, Irene A. [1 ,2 ]
Mollema, Liesbeth [1 ]
Ruiter, Robert A. C. [2 ]
Paulussen, Theo G. W. [3 ]
de Melker, Hester E. [1 ]
Kok, Gerjo [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, RIVM, Ctr Infect Dis Control, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Work & Social Psychol, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] TNO Healthy Living Netherlands Org Appl Sci Res, NL-2333 AL Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Childhood vaccination; Immunization; On-line focus group; Qualitative study; Decision-making; Beliefs; DECISION-MAKING; RISK PERCEPTION; HEALTH BELIEFS; IMMUNIZATION; ATTITUDES; NETHERLANDS; VACCINES; DECIDE; MMR;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-13-1183
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: In high income countries, vaccine-preventable diseases have been greatly reduced through routine vaccination programs. Despite this success, many parents question, and a small proportion even refuse vaccination for their children. As no qualitative studies have explored the factors behind these decisions among Dutch parents, we performed a study using online focus groups. Methods: In total, eight online focus groups (n = 60) which included Dutch parents with at least one child, aged 0-4 years, for whom they refused all or part of the vaccinations within the National Immunization Program (NIP). A thematic analysis was performed to explore factors that influenced the parents' decisions to refuse vaccination. Results: Refusal of vaccination was found to reflect multiple factors including family lifestyle; perceptions about the child's body and immune system; perceived risks of disease, vaccine efficacy, and side effects; perceived advantages of experiencing the disease; prior negative experience with vaccination; and social environment. The use of online focus groups proved to be an effective qualitative research method providing meaningful data. Conclusion: Information provided by the NIP turned out to be insufficient for this group of parents. More trust in the NIP and deliberate decisions might result from increased parental understanding of lifestyle and disease susceptibility, the impact of vaccinations on the immune system, and the relative risks of diseases and their vaccines. The public health institute should also inform parents that the NIP is recommended but non-mandatory.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], IMM SUMM STAT REF CO
[2]  
[Anonymous], ADV PREVENTIVE MED
[3]  
[Anonymous], INFECT DIS B
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2100210142011 RIVM
[5]   Qualitative analysis of mothers' decision-making about vaccines for infants: The importance of trust [J].
Benin, AL ;
Wisler-Scher, DJ ;
Colson, E ;
Shapiro, ED ;
Holmboe, ES .
PEDIATRICS, 2006, 117 (05) :1532-1541
[6]   Debunking Vaccination Myths: Strong Risk Negations Can Increase Perceived Vaccination Risks [J].
Betsch, Cornelia ;
Sachse, Katharina .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 32 (02) :146-155
[7]   Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions [J].
Betsch, Cornelia ;
Brewer, Noel T. ;
Brocard, Pauline ;
Davies, Patrick ;
Gaissmaier, Wolfgang ;
Haase, Niels ;
Leask, Julie ;
Renkewitz, Frank ;
Renner, Britta ;
Reyna, Valerie F. ;
Rossmann, Constanze ;
Sachse, Katharina ;
Schachinger, Alexander ;
Siegrist, Michael ;
Stryk, Marybelle .
VACCINE, 2012, 30 (25) :3727-3733
[8]   Making sense of perceptions of risk of diseases and vaccinations: a qualitative study combining models of health beliefs, decision-making and risk perception [J].
Bond, Lyndal ;
Nolan, Terry .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
[9]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[10]   Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination [J].
Brewer, Noel T. ;
Chapman, Gretchen B. ;
Gibbons, Frederick X. ;
Gerrard, Meg ;
McCaul, Kevin D. ;
Weinstein, Neil D. .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 26 (02) :136-145