Determination of the atmospheric boundary layer height from radiosonde and lidar backscatter

被引:28
作者
Hennemuth, Barbara [1 ]
Lammert, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Meteorol, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
atmospheric boundary layer height; convective boundary layer; residual layer; lidar; radiosounding;
D O I
10.1007/s10546-005-9035-3
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The height of the atmospheric boundary layer is derived with the help of two different measuring systems and methods. From radiosoundings the boundary layer height is determined by the parcel method and by temperature and humidity gradients. From lidar backscatter measurements a combination of the averaging variance method and the high-resolution gradient method is used to determine boundary layer heights. In this paper lidar-derived boundary layer heights on a 10 min basis are presented. Datasets from four experiments - two over land and two over the sea - are used to compare boundary layer heights from both methods. Only the daytime boundary layer is investigated because the height of the nighttime stable boundary layer is below the range of the lidar. In many situations the boundary layer heights from both systems coincide within +/- 200 m. This corresponds to the standard deviation of lidar-derived 10-min values within a 1-h interval and is due to the time and space variability of the boundary layer height. Deviations appear for certain situations and depend on which radiosonde method is applied. The parcel method fails over land surfaces in the afternoon when the boundary layer stabilizes and over the ocean when the boundary layer is slightly stable. An automatic radiosonde gradient method sometimes fails when multiple layers are present, e.g. a residual layer above the growing convective boundary layer. The lidar method has the advantage of continuous tracing and thus avoids confusion with elevated layers. On the other hand, it mostly fails in situations with boundary layer clouds.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 200
页数:20
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
*ATM RAD MEAS, 1999, PROGR 1999 NAUR 99 S
[2]  
*ATM RAD MEAS, 2000, DIAL RAM LID VAL INT
[3]   Mixing-height differences between land use types: Dependence on wind speed [J].
Banta, RM ;
White, AB .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D10)
[4]   AN APPLIED-MODEL FOR THE HEIGHT OF THE DAYTIME MIXED-LAYER AND THE ENTRAINMENT ZONE [J].
BATCHVAROVA, E ;
GRYNING, SE .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1994, 71 (03) :311-323
[5]  
Beyrich F, 1998, J APPL METEOROL, V37, P255, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037<0255:EOTEZD>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
BEYRICH F, 2004, P 16 S BOUND LAY TUR
[8]   Ground-based differential absorption lidar for water-vapor and temperature profiling: methodology [J].
Bosenberg, J .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1998, 37 (18) :3845-3860
[9]   Modelling regional scale surface energy exchanges and cbl growth in a heterogeneous, urban-rural landscape [J].
Cleugh, HA ;
Grimmond, CSB .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2001, 98 (01) :1-31
[10]  
Cohn SA, 2000, J APPL METEOROL, V39, P1233, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<1233:BLHAEZ>2.0.CO