Effects of E-Waste Regulation on New Product Introduction

被引:170
作者
Plambeck, Erica [1 ]
Wang, Qiong [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Alcatel Lucent, Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ 07974 USA
关键词
environmental regulation; computer electronics industry; dynamic game; new product introduction; MONOPOLY; RESPONSIBILITY; PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1080.0970
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the impact of e-waste regulation on new product introduction in a stylized model of the electronics industry. Manufacturers choose the development time and expenditure for each new version of a durable product, which together determine its quality. Consumers purchase the new product and dispose of the last-generation product, which becomes e-waste. The price of a new product strictly increases with its quality and consumers' rational expectation about the time until the next new product will be introduced. "Feeupon-sale" types of e-waste regulation cause manufacturers to increase their equilibrium development time and expenditure, and thus the incremental quality for each new product. As new products are introduced ( and disposed of) less frequently, the quantity of e-waste decreases and, even excluding the environmental benefits, social welfare may increase. Consumers pay a higher price for each new product because they anticipate using it for longer, which increases manufacturers' profits. Unfortunately, existing "fee-upon-sale" types of e-waste regulation fail to motivate manufacturers to design for recyclability. In contrast, "fee-upon-disposal" types of e-waste regulation such as individual extended producer responsibility motivate design for recyclability but, in competitive product categories, fail to reduce the frequency of new product introduction.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 347
页数:15
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
*APPL, 2007, APPL INC ANN REP FOR
[2]   Too little, too early: Introduction timing and new product performance in the personal digital assistant industry [J].
Bayus, BL ;
Jain, S ;
Rao, AG .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1997, 34 (01) :50-63
[3]   The financial rewards of new product introductions in the personal computer industry [J].
Bayus, BL ;
Erickson, G ;
Jacobson, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (02) :197-210
[4]  
CASEY KP, 2006, US TODAY 0815
[5]   DURABILITY AND MONOPOLY [J].
COASE, RH .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1972, 15 (01) :143-149
[6]  
Cohen M. A., 2000, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, V2, P337, DOI 10.1287/msom.2.4.337.12341
[7]   New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff [J].
Cohen, MA ;
Eliashberg, J ;
Ho, TH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1996, 42 (02) :173-186
[8]  
DIGNAN L, 2007, ZDNET BLOG 0613
[9]   Product innovation by a durable-good monopoly [J].
Fishman, A ;
Rob, R .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 31 (02) :237-252
[10]   Upgrades, tradeins, and buybacks [J].
Fudenberg, D ;
Tirole, J .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 29 (02) :235-258