Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice

被引:1044
作者
Hertwig, R
Barron, G
Weber, EU
Erev, I
机构
[1] Univ Basel, Dept Psychol, CH-4055 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[4] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Haifa, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
When people have access to information sources such as newspaper weather forecasts, drug-package inserts, and mutual-fund brochures, all of which provide convenient descriptions of risky prospects, they can make decisions from description. When people must decide whether to back up their computer's hard drive, cross a busy street, or go out on a date, however, they typically do not have any summary description of the possible outcomes or their likelihoods. For such decisions, people can call only on their own encounters with such prospects, making decisions from experience. Decisions from experience and decisions from description can lead to dramatically different choice behavior. In the case of decisions from description, people make choices as if they overweight the probability of rare events, as described by prospect theory. We found that in the case of decisions from experience, in contrast, people make choices as if they underweight the probability of rare events, and we explored the impact of two possible causes of this underweighting-reliance on relatively small samples of information and overweighting of recently sampled information. We conclude with a call for two different theories of risky choice.
引用
收藏
页码:534 / 539
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, THEORY GAMES EC BEHA
[3]   Accidents and decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of four models [J].
Barkan, R ;
Zohar, D ;
Erev, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1998, 74 (02) :118-144
[4]   Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions [J].
Barron, G ;
Erev, I .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 16 (03) :215-233
[5]  
Camerer C.F., 2000, CHOICES VALUES FRAME, P288
[6]  
CHU YP, 1990, AM ECON REV, V80, P902
[7]   Signal detection by human observers: A cutoff reinforcement learning model of categorization decisions under uncertainty [J].
Erev, I .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1998, 105 (02) :280-298
[8]   Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases [J].
Fiedler, K .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2000, 107 (04) :659-676
[9]   Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? [J].
Hertwig, R ;
Ortmann, A .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2001, 24 (03) :383-+
[10]  
HERTWIG R, IN PRESS INFORMATION