MORE COSMOPOLITAN, NO LESS LOCAL The orientations of international travellers

被引:83
作者
Gustafson, Per [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Inst Housing & Urban Res, SE-80129 Gavle, Sweden
关键词
work-related travel; cosmopolitanism; localism; orientations; belonging; Sweden; BUSINESS TRAVEL; MOBILITY; WORK; GENDER;
D O I
10.1080/14616690802209689
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
International business travellers are sometimes described as a cosmopolitan elite, with a strong international orientation but a low preference for local involvement and local obligations. This article uses Swedish survey data to investigate these claims, by comparing the orientations of persons who frequently travel abroad at work with the orientations of other workers. Frequent international travellers generally have more cosmopolitan orientations than others, but the local ties are not significantly weaker among frequent travellers than among occasional travellers or non-travellers. In some respects, notably social networks and associational activities, international travellers tend in fact to be more involved than non-travellers in all the four examined spheres - locally, regionally, nationally and internationally. Concerns among social theorists that highly mobile, locally disconnected elites are undermining social cohesion may therefore be exaggerated. Theoretically, the study suggests that localism and cosmopolitanism should not be treated as necessarily opposite and mutually exclusive phenomena, but that mobility in various forms may be used to combine local and cosmopolitan resources.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 47
页数:23
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Space, Place and Gender, DOI DOI 10.1049/EL:19990302
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The Rise of the Network Society
[3]  
Axhausen K.W., 2007, Mobilities, V2, P15, DOI DOI 10.1080/17450100601106203
[4]  
Bauman Zygmunt., 1998, Globalization: The Human Consequences
[5]   Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda [J].
Beck, U ;
Sznaider, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2006, 57 (01) :1-23
[6]  
Butler T., 2003, LONDON CALLING MIDDL
[7]   Social exclusion, mobility and access [J].
Cass, N ;
Shove, E ;
Urry, J .
SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2005, 53 (03) :539-555
[8]  
Conradson D., 2007, MOBILITIES-UK, V2, P231, DOI DOI 10.1080/17450100701381573
[9]  
Cresswell Tim., 2004, PLACE SHORT INTRO
[10]  
Doyle J., 2001, WHEREVER NEXT WORK M