Fetal radiation exposure is minimal after pelvimetry by modified digital radiography

被引:8
作者
Ferguson, JE
DeAngelis, GA
Newberry, YG
Finnerty, JJ
Agarwal, S
机构
[1] UNIV VIRGINIA,SCH MED,DEPT RADIOL,CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22908
[2] UNIV VIRGINIA,SCH MED,DIV RADIOL PHYS,CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22908
关键词
digital radiography; pelvimetry; fetal-pelvic disproportion; thermoluminescent dosimeters; modified axial slice;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70133-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the maximal fetal exposure to radiation by use of thermoluminescent dosimeters when pelvic measurements were preformed by standard or modified digital radiography. STUDY DESIGN: Digital radiography of the pelvis was performed according to a standard technique. Lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeters were positioned on the patient's skin to quantitate the maximal amount of radiation exposure to the fetus. The standard technique often included a portion of fetal vertex. The axial view technique was modified to use an angle of inclination of 17 to 29 degrees relative to the vertical axis. RESULTS: Digital radiography was well tolerated and interpretable images were consistently obtained. The maximal dose to the fetal vertex by use of the standard digital axial slice was 465 mrad. By modifying the standard digital technique and using an angle of inclination of 17 to 29 degrees it was possible to obtain an axial section without including any portion of the fetal vertex. This reduced the maximal total dose to the fetal vertex to 55 mrad, which is less than the background radiation exposure to the fetus over a 9-month period from natural sources, CONCLUSION: Data reported indicate that total fetal radiation exposure is minimal after pelvimetry by digital radiography. incorporating the modification of the angle for the axial slice, as reported here, resulted in a further significant decrease in fetal radiation exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 267
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1995, AM COLL OBST GYN TEC, V158
[2]
CT PELVIMETRY - THE FOVEAE ARE NOT AN ACCURATE LANDMARK FOR THE LEVEL OF THE ISCHIAL SPINES [J].
ARONSON, D ;
KIER, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 156 (03) :527-530
[3]
BLITHELL JF, 1975, BRIT J CANCER, V31, P271
[4]
BRENT RL, 1989, SEMIN ONCOL, V16, P347
[5]
Colcher AE, 1944, AM J ROENTGENOL RADI, V51, P207
[6]
CUNNINGHAM FG, 1993, NORMAL PELVIS, P283
[7]
PELVIMETRY BY DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY - A LOW-DOSE EXAMINATION [J].
FEDERLE, MP ;
COHEN, HA ;
ROSENWEIN, MF ;
BRANTZAWADZKI, MN ;
CANN, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (03) :733-735
[8]
AN EVALUATION OF THE USEFULNESS OF X-RAY PELVIMETRY - COMPARISON OF THE THOMS AND MODIFIED BALL METHODS WITH MANUAL PELVIMETRY [J].
FINE, EA ;
BRACKEN, M ;
BERKOWITZ, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1980, 137 (01) :15-20
[9]
PRENATAL X-RAY-EXPOSURE AND CHILDHOOD-CANCER IN TWINS [J].
HARVEY, EB ;
BOICE, JD ;
HONEYMAN, M ;
FLANNERY, JT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (09) :541-545
[10]
JABLON S, 1970, LANCET, V2, P1000