Influence of synbiotic containing Lactobacillus acidophilus La5, Bifidobacterium lactis Bb 12, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus and oligofructose on gut barrier function and sepsis in critically ill patients:: A randomised controlled trial

被引:141
作者
Jain, PK
McNaught, CE
Anderson, ADG
MacFie, J
Mitchell, CJ
机构
[1] Scarborough Gen Hosp, Combined Gastroenterol Unit, Dept Surg, Scarborough YO12 6QL, England
[2] Scarborough Gen Hosp, Combined Gastroenterol Unit, Dept Med, Scarborough YO12 6QL, England
关键词
synbiotic; probiotic; prebiotic; critical illness;
D O I
10.1016/j.clnu.2003.12.002
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background & aims: Infective complications are a common cause of mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients. Many factors affect sepsis, one of which is gut barrier function. The aim of this study was to determine whether the oral administration of a synbiotic preparation could alter gut barrier function in critically ill patients and thus reduce sepsis. Methods: A total of 90 patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were randomised to receive either synbiotic or placebo preparations (45 into each group). The synbiotic preparation consisted of Lactobacillus acidophilus Las, Bifidobacterium lactis Bb 12, Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus (probiotics) with oligofructose (prebiotic). Gut barrier function was assessed by measurement of intestinal permeability (lactulose/rhamnose test) and culture of nasogastric aspirate on days 1 and 8. All septic complications and mortality were recorded. Results: There were no differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, APACHE II or POSSUM scores. After 1 week of therapy, patients in the synbiotic group had a significantly lower incidence of potentially pathogenic bacteria (43% versus 75%, P=0.05) and multiple organisms (39% versus 75%, P=0.01) in their nasogastric aspirates than controls. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of intestinal permeability, septic complications or mortality. Conclusions: The administration of synbiotic in critically ill patients favourably altered the microbial composition of the upper gastrointestinal tract but had no effect on intestinal permeability and was not associated with measurable clinical benefit. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 475
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Effects of different probiotic strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium on bacterial translocation and liver injury in an acute liver injury model [J].
Adawi, D ;
Ahrné, S ;
Molin, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 70 (03) :213-220
[2]  
Barrow GI., 1993, COWAN STEELS MANUAL, V3th
[3]   Pre-, pro- and synbiotics [J].
Bengmark, S .
CURRENT OPINION IN CLINICAL NUTRITION AND METABOLIC CARE, 2001, 4 (06) :571-579
[4]  
Bengmark Stig, 2002, Curr Opin Crit Care, V8, P145, DOI 10.1097/00075198-200204000-00010
[5]  
BOTTERILL I, 2000, CARE CRIT ILL, V16, P6
[6]  
Collins MD, 1999, AM J CLIN NUTR, V69, p1052S, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/69.5.1052s
[7]   Effect of a glutamine-enriched enteral diet on intestinal permeability and infectious morbidity at 28 days in critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome:: A randomized, single-blind, prospective, multicenter study [J].
Conejero, R ;
Bonet, A ;
Grau, T ;
Esteban, A ;
Mesejo, A ;
Montejo, JC ;
López, J ;
Acosta, JA .
NUTRITION, 2002, 18 (09) :716-721
[8]  
COPELAND GP, 1991, BRIT J SURG, V78, P356
[9]  
DUMOULIN GC, 1982, LANCET, V1, P242
[10]  
Gill HS, 2001, AM J CLIN NUTR, V74, P833