Comparison of Pain Scores With 30-Gauge and 32-Gauge Needles for Periocular Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections

被引:19
作者
Yomtoob, David E. [1 ]
Dewan, Mohit A. [1 ]
Lee, Michael S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Harrison, Andrew R. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Ophthalmol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Neurol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Neurosurg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Otolaryngol, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
CREAM;
D O I
10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181b1e526
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 [眼科学];
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether a 32-gauge needle can reduce the pain associated with periocular injections of botulinum toxin type A compared with 30-gauge needles. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, masked study, 30 patients received bilateral periocular injections of botulinum toxin type A for benign essential blepharospasm. For each patient, a 30-gauge needle was used on one side of the face, and a 32-gauge needle was used on the other side. Equal number of injections and equal amounts of botulinum toxin type A at each injection site were administered on each side of the face. Patients were then asked to rate their pain level on each side of the face, using a standardized 11-point visual analogue pain scale. Results: The average pain score was 4.38 +/- 2.02 for 30-gauge needles and 3.98 +/- 1.65 for 32-gauge needles. Statistical analysis via Mann-Whitney U test confirmed the null hypothesis that no statistical difference in pain level existed between the 2 needle sizes. Conclusions: There is no difference in perceived pain when comparing periocular botulinum toxin type A injections with 30- and 32-gauge needles. In addition, smaller gauge needles require special order and result in greater cost. The authors recommend continued use of 30-gauge needles for botulinum toxin injection in the office setting. (Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;25:376-377)
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 377
页数:2
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
*AM PAIN SOC, 1999, PULSE, V36, P16
[2]
Needle temperature effect on pain ratings after injection [J].
Bartell, Julie C. ;
Roberts, Katie A. ;
Schutte, Natalie J. ;
ShermanJ, Kimberly C. ;
Muller, Daniel ;
Hayney, Mary S. .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2008, 24 (03) :260-264
[3]
Efficacy of skin cooling and EMLA cream application for pain relief of periocular botulinum toxin injection [J].
Elibol, Orhan ;
Ozkan, Berna ;
Hekimhan, Pelin Kaynak ;
Caglar, Yusuf .
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 23 (02) :130-133
[4]
Historical notes on botulism, Clostridium batulinum, botulinum toxin, and the idea of the therapeutic use of the toxin [J].
Erbguth, FJ .
MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2004, 19 :S2-S6
[5]
Fishman Scott M, 2005, J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother, V19, P77
[6]
Flanagan Terry, 2007, Gen Dent, V55, P216
[7]
Harrison Andrew R, 2003, Curr Opin Ophthalmol, V14, P241, DOI 10.1097/00055735-200310000-00003
[8]
Skin cooling before periocular botulinum toxin A injection [J].
Linder, JS ;
Edmondson, BC ;
Laquis, SJ ;
Drewry, RD ;
Flemings, JC .
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 18 (06) :441-442
[9]
Anesthesia with EMLA® cream for botulinum A toxin injection into eyelids [J].
Söylev, MF ;
Koçak, N ;
Kuvaki, B ;
Özkan, SB ;
Kir, E .
OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2002, 216 (05) :355-358
[10]
Torma L, 1999, Pulse, V36, P16